H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Denisa Chladkova vs Sabine Appelmans H2H: 1-3

Sabine Appelmans holds a 3–1 lead over Denisa Chladkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Sabine Appelmans leads 2–0 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Denisa Chladkova won the 2001 Australian Open second round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Denisa Chladkova
CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Sabine Appelmans
BEL Age 54 Left-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 19, 2001* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Denisa Chladkova #53 6-2 6-2 Sabine Appelmans #55 Match data
Oct 22, 1999* Bratislava WTA 250 R16 Hard Sabine Appelmans #35 6-1 5-7 6-2 Denisa Chladkova #67 Match data
Sep 24, 1999* Luxembourg WTA 250 R16 Carpet Sabine Appelmans #49 6-3 6-4 Denisa Chladkova #66 Match data
Oct 23, 1997* Luxembourg WTA 250 R32 Carpet Sabine Appelmans #18 6-0 6-4 Denisa Chladkova #42 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Denisa Chladkova #655 #31 983 1,740 129 165 43.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sabine Appelmans #94 #16 1,502 1,923 279 202 58.0% 0 0 0 2 5 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Denisa Chladkova Sabine Appelmans
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1987 1–1 50.0% #283 1,502 0 0
16 1995 1–1 50.0% #190 1,507 0 0 1988 1–3 25.0% #196 1,498 0 0
17 1996 4–2 66.7% #77 1,578 0 0 1989 2–5 28.6% #144 1,468 0 0
18 1997 11–18 37.9% #54 1,576 0 0 1990 21–12 63.6% #22 1,679 0 0
19 1998 4–19 17.4% #119 1,440 0 0 1991 34–14 70.8% #18 1,873 0 2
20 1999 18–15 54.5% #58 1,646 0 0 1992 26–15 63.4% #26 1,875 0 3
21 2000 16–19 45.7% #50 1,645 0 0 1993 19–15 55.9% #36 1,828 0 3
22 2001 17–20 45.9% #50 1,661 0 0 1994 29–16 64.4% #27 1,821 0 5
23 2002 10–14 41.7% #63 1,642 0 0 1995 24–17 58.5% #31 1,809 0 6
24 2003 20–19 51.3% #43 1,666 0 0 1996 26–16 61.9% #21 1,843 0 7
25 2004 21–20 51.2% #54 1,699 0 0 1997 37–26 58.7% #16 1,856 0 7
26 2005 7–18 28.0% #127 1,552 0 0 1998 13–18 41.9% #48 1,721 0 7
27 — — — — — — — 1999 25–21 54.3% #30 1,777 0 7
28 — — — — — — — 2000 20–22 47.6% #49 1,692 0 7
29 — — — — — — — 2001 1–1 50.0% #94 1,685 0 7