H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Denisa Chladkova vs Sandra Kleinova H2H: 2-1
Denisa Chladkova holds a 2–1 lead over Sandra Kleinova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Denisa Chladkova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Denisa Chladkova won the 2000 Berlin second round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 48
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2000* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Denisa Chladkova | 6-2 6-1 | Sandra Kleinova | Match data |
| Jun 25, 1997* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Denisa Chladkova | 7-6 6-4 | Sandra Kleinova | Match data |
| Jun 19, 1997* | Rosmalen | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Sandra Kleinova | 7-6 6-4 | Denisa Chladkova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denisa Chladkova | #655 | #31 | 983 | 1,740 | 129 | 165 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sandra Kleinova | #759 | #41 | 606 | 1,633 | 59 | 119 | 33.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Denisa Chladkova | Sandra Kleinova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1996 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #77 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #112 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1997 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #54 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #128 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 4–19 | 17.4% | #119 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #42 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #58 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 3–20 | 13.0% | #163 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #50 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #63 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #127 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #63 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #121 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #43 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #137 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #54 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #87 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2005 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #127 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #145 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |