H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Denisa Chladkova vs Sandrine Testud H2H: 0-2
Sandrine Testud holds a 2–0 lead over Denisa Chladkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sandrine Testud leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Sandrine Testud won the 2000 Berlin fourth round 7-6(0) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 54
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2000* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Sandrine Testud | 7-6(0) 6-2 | Denisa Chladkova | Match data |
| Jul 10, 1998* | Prague | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Sandrine Testud | 7-6 7-5 | Denisa Chladkova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denisa Chladkova | #655 | #31 | 983 | 1,740 | 129 | 165 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sandrine Testud | #1,203 | #9 | 2,233 | 2,019 | 309 | 236 | 56.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Denisa Chladkova | Sandrine Testud | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1996 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #77 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1997 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #54 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 4–19 | 17.4% | #119 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #109 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #58 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #106 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #50 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #100 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #81 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #63 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #41 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #43 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #41 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #54 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #14 | 1,938 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2005 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #127 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 51–26 | 66.2% | #14 | 1,946 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #13 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #17 | 1,916 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 53–27 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,976 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #38 | 1,845 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #313 | 1,739 | 0 | 3 |