H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Denisa Chladkova vs Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor H2H: 1-2
Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor holds a 2–1 lead over Denisa Chladkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor leads 1–0 on carpet, while Denisa Chladkova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor won the 1999 Linz quarterfinal 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 50
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 1999* | Linz | WTA 500 | QF | Carpet | Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | 6-2 6-0 | Denisa Chladkova | Match data |
| Jan 8, 1998* | Hope Island | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | 6-1 7-5 | Denisa Chladkova | Match data |
| Jun 11, 1997* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Denisa Chladkova | 6-3 4-6 6-1 | Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denisa Chladkova | #655 | #31 | 983 | 1,740 | 129 | 165 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | #739 | #29 | 917 | 1,771 | 109 | 123 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Denisa Chladkova | Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1996 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #77 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #167 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1997 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #54 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #122 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 4–19 | 17.4% | #119 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #94 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #58 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #50 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #57 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #33 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #63 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #36 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2003 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #43 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2004 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #54 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #160 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2005 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #127 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |