H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Denisa Chladkova vs Silvija Talaja H2H: 3-0

Denisa Chladkova holds a 3–0 lead over Silvija Talaja in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Denisa Chladkova leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Denisa Chladkova won the 2005 Australian Open first round 7-6(3) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Denisa Chladkova
CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Silvija Talaja
CRO Age 48 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 19, 2005* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Denisa Chladkova #51 7-6(3) 6-3 Silvija Talaja #111 Match data
Oct 17, 2000* Linz WTA 500 R32 Carpet Denisa Chladkova #53 7-6(2) 6-2 Silvija Talaja #23 Match data
Aug 7, 1999* Knokke-Heist WTA 250 SF Clay Denisa Chladkova #77 6-2 6-2 Silvija Talaja #36 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Denisa Chladkova #655 #31 983 1,740 129 165 43.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Silvija Talaja #1,214 #18 1,376 1,811 130 151 46.3% 0 0 0 2 0 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Denisa Chladkova Silvija Talaja
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1993 0–2 0.0% #288 1,481 0 0
16 1995 1–1 50.0% #190 1,507 0 0 1994 1–1 50.0% #251 1,486 0 0
17 1996 4–2 66.7% #77 1,578 0 0 1995 0–3 0.0% #280 1,456 0 0
18 1997 11–18 37.9% #54 1,576 0 0 1996 9–4 69.2% #106 1,588 0 0
19 1998 4–19 17.4% #119 1,440 0 0 1997 2–4 33.3% #199 1,555 0 0
20 1999 18–15 54.5% #58 1,646 0 0 1998 7–6 53.8% #85 1,603 0 0
21 2000 16–19 45.7% #50 1,645 0 0 1999 32–22 59.3% #29 1,700 0 0
22 2001 17–20 45.9% #50 1,661 0 0 2000 24–27 47.1% #29 1,647 0 2
23 2002 10–14 41.7% #63 1,642 0 0 2001 9–18 33.3% #109 1,543 0 2
24 2003 20–19 51.3% #43 1,666 0 0 2002 19–23 45.2% #74 1,559 0 2
25 2004 21–20 51.2% #54 1,699 0 0 2003 15–21 41.7% #93 1,547 0 2
26 2005 7–18 28.0% #127 1,552 0 0 2004 10–14 41.7% #114 1,543 0 2
27 — — — — — — — 2005 2–6 25.0% #190 1,507 0 2