H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Denisa Chladkova vs Tamarine Tanasugarn H2H: 1-3

Tamarine Tanasugarn holds a 3–1 lead over Denisa Chladkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Tamarine Tanasugarn leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tamarine Tanasugarn won the 2003 Miami second round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Denisa Chladkova
CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Tamarine Tanasugarn
THA Age 49 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 21, 2003* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Tamarine Tanasugarn #33 6-2 6-2 Denisa Chladkova #43 Match data
May 29, 2002* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Tamarine Tanasugarn #20 6-3 6-2 Denisa Chladkova #92 Match data
May 15, 2002* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Denisa Chladkova #105 6-0 6-2 Tamarine Tanasugarn #19 Match data
Jan 10, 2002* Canberra WTA 250 R16 Hard Tamarine Tanasugarn #30 6-4 6-3 Denisa Chladkova #51 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Denisa Chladkova #655 #31 983 1,740 129 165 43.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tamarine Tanasugarn #947 #19 1,508 1,818 267 273 49.4% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Denisa Chladkova Tamarine Tanasugarn
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1995 1–1 50.0% #190 1,507 0 0 1993 0–1 0.0% #407 1,482 0 0
17 1996 4–2 66.7% #77 1,578 0 0 1994 1–1 50.0% #227 1,492 0 0
18 1997 11–18 37.9% #54 1,576 0 0 1995 2–5 28.6% #213 1,478 0 0
19 1998 4–19 17.4% #119 1,440 0 0 1996 9–5 64.3% #75 1,609 0 0
20 1999 18–15 54.5% #58 1,646 0 0 1997 18–20 47.4% #47 1,647 0 0
21 2000 16–19 45.7% #50 1,645 0 0 1998 20–21 48.8% #37 1,701 0 0
22 2001 17–20 45.9% #50 1,661 0 0 1999 8–13 38.1% #71 1,634 0 0
23 2002 10–14 41.7% #63 1,642 0 0 2000 30–18 62.5% #28 1,787 0 0
24 2003 20–19 51.3% #43 1,666 0 0 2001 24–21 53.3% #29 1,697 0 0
25 2004 21–20 51.2% #54 1,699 0 0 2002 32–26 55.2% #28 1,676 0 0
26 2005 7–18 28.0% #127 1,552 0 0 2003 28–23 54.9% #34 1,694 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 2004 19–24 44.2% #66 1,623 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 2005 7–16 30.4% #122 1,503 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2006 9–7 56.2% #72 1,588 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2007 9–18 33.3% #117 1,570 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2008 19–15 55.9% #37 1,702 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2009 10–12 45.5% #101 1,653 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2010 14–9 60.9% #62 1,734 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2011 4–10 28.6% #94 1,649 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2012 4–7 36.4% #152 1,594 0 4
38 — — — — — — — 2015 0–1 0.0% #855 1,577 0 4