H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Denisa Chladkova vs Tina Pisnik H2H: 0-2
Tina Pisnik holds a 2–0 lead over Denisa Chladkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tina Pisnik leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tina Pisnik won the 2004 Paris third round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
SLO
Age 45
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2004* | Paris | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Tina Pisnik | 6-2 6-1 | Denisa Chladkova | Match data |
| Sep 1, 1999* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Tina Pisnik | 6-3 6-4 | Denisa Chladkova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denisa Chladkova | #655 | #31 | 983 | 1,740 | 129 | 165 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tina Pisnik | #592 | #29 | 1,046 | 1,721 | 91 | 117 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Denisa Chladkova | Tina Pisnik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1996 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #77 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #414 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1997 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #54 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #81 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 4–19 | 17.4% | #119 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #73 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1999 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #58 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #63 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2000 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #50 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #47 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2001 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #31 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2002 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #63 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 8–22 | 26.7% | #131 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2003 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #43 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #495 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2004 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #54 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2005 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #127 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |