H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Denise Carter vs Kristien Shaw H2H: 1-0

Denise Carter holds a 1–0 lead over Kristien Shaw in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Denise Carter leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Denise Carter won the 1969 Ojai quarterfinal 7-5 6-8 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Denise Carter
USA Age 76
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Kristien Shaw
USA Age 74

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Denise Carter 7-5 6-8 6-1 Kristien Shaw Match data Apr 26, 1969* QF Ojai WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Denise Carter — — — 1,774 67 58 53.6% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Kristien Shaw — — — 1,924 119 141 45.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Denise Carter Kristien Shaw
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1968 0–2 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1969 5–8 38.5% — 1,514 0 0
17 1968 14–7 66.7% — 1,629 0 1 1970 12–10 54.5% — 1,592 0 1
18 1969 26–15 63.4% — 1,740 0 3 1971 23–25 47.9% — 1,715 0 1
19 1970 15–17 46.9% — 1,705 0 3 1972 2–13 13.3% — 1,623 0 1
20 1971 9–12 42.9% — 1,755 0 3 1973 29–24 54.7% — 1,906 0 1
21 1972 0–3 0.0% — 1,702 0 3 1974 10–14 41.7% — 1,811 0 1
22 — — — — — — — 1975 14–14 50.0% — 1,792 0 1
23 1974 3–4 42.9% — 1,681 0 3 1976 6–4 60.0% — 1,846 0 1
24 — — — — — — — 1977 17–20 45.9% — 1,834 0 1
25 — — — — — — — 1978 1–7 12.5% — 1,751 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Denise Carter Kristien Shaw
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 3 4 7 42.9% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
17 1968 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — 1970 8 4 12 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
18 1969 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 18 9 27 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 1971 2 4 6 33.3% 0 6 6 0.0% 21 15 36 58.3% — — — —
19 1970 7 5 12 58.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — 1972 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
20 1971 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1973 6 6 12 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 12 5 17 70.6% 3 5 8 37.5%
21 1972 — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1974 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 7 12 41.7%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 5 6 11 45.5% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9%
23 1974 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1976 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 12 24 50.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
Career — 21 15 36 58.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 34 26 60 56.7% 8 10 18 44.4% — 31 42 73 42.5% 18 26 44 40.9% 43 37 80 53.8% 27 35 62 43.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Denise Carter Kristien Shaw
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1485 99.9 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 — — -0.41
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1515 113.4 — — — — +28 +25 -27 42.3% -0.39 1–1 — — -0.23
17 1968 1630 116.2 — — — — +22 — +11 59.6% +0.72 5–0 (100%) — — -0.39 1970 1593 114.0 — — — — +56 — -61 55.3% +0.49 3–2 (60%) — — +2.96
18 1969 1740 131.3 — — — — -12 — +61 61.3% +0.95 6–7 (46%) — — -0.26 1971 1716 133.5 — — — — -75 -249 +83 48.6% -0.28 6–5 (55%) 3–2 (60%) 102.1 -3.43
19 1970 1706 131.4 — — — — +62 -224 +37 51.4% +0.18 5–7 (42%) 1–0 — -2.42 1972 1624 116.8 — — — — -39 — +85 25.0% -2.00 1–5 (17%) 1–1 — -2.01
20 1971 1755 129.5 — — — — -42 — +16 40.0% -0.80 3–2 (60%) 1–2 (33%) — -1.95 1973 1906 155.3 — — — — -158 -300 -12 51.7% +0.41 8–4 (67%) 6–10 (38%) 106.7 -8.65
21 1972 1703 91.7 — — — — — — -12 0.0% -4.75 — — — -0.34 1974 1812 131.9 — — — — -145 — +87 35.4% -1.00 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — -2.83
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1792 131.3 — — — — -35 -117 — 49.2% +0.13 3–4 (43%) 2–5 (29%) 97.4 +0.63
23 1974 1682 104.2 — — — — -15 — — 46.7% -0.67 0–1 1–1 — +0.60 1976 1846 129.0 — — — — -16 -194 — 63.6% +0.77 0–2 0–2 — -1.43
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1834 142.3 — — — — -45 — +56 43.5% -0.34 8–5 (62%) 3–5 (38%) 101.2 -3.83
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1752 112.7 — — — — -71 — — 22.2% -1.61 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.72
Career — 1774 129.9 — — — — +1 -224 +38 53.3% +0.25 19–17 (53%) 3–3 (50%) 103.8 -3.90 — 1924 142.0 — — — — -62 -212 +44 45.7% -0.23 33–34 (49%) 17–29 (37%) 98.1 -7.85

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.