H2H data updated: 2026-09-10 00:00 UTC

Diane Morrison vs Jane Preyer H2H: 1-0

Diane Morrison holds a 1–0 lead over Jane Preyer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Diane Morrison leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Diane Morrison won the 1980 Sydney International round of 64 6-3 6-4.

H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Diane Morrison 6-3 6-4 Jane Preyer Match data Dec 3, 1980* R64 Sydney International WTA 500 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Diane Morrison 1,694 41 43 48.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Jane Preyer 1,685 36 43 45.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Diane Morrison Jane Preyer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1973 2–1 66.7% 1,520 0 0
15 1974 0–1 0.0% 1,504 0 0
18 1977 1–1 50.0% 1,507 0 0
20 1979 17–11 60.7% 1,675 0 1
21 1980 9–22 29.0% 1,593 0 1
22 1981 12–7 63.2% 1,636 0 1 1976 1–1 50.0% 1,496 0 0
23 1977 1–3 25.0% 1,468 0 0
24 1978 4–2 66.7% 1,528 0 0
25 1979 3–3 50.0% 1,522 0 0
26 1980 8–11 42.1% 1,529 0 0
27 1981 11–9 55.0% 1,645 0 0
28 1982 8–11 42.1% 1,634 0 0
29 1983 0–3 0.0% 1,584 0 0

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Diane Morrison Jane Preyer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1973 1521 107.5 +81 57.1% +1.28 1–0 0–1 +0.85
15 1974 1504 99.5 33.3% -1.00 0–1 +0.26
18 1977 1508 111.9 60.0% +1.60 0–1 +0.04
20 1979 1676 136.8 -18 -22 -41 59.0% +1.03 3–2 (60%) 0–2 +1.94
21 1980 1594 117.4 -123 +90 31.9% -1.27 3–4 (43%) 3–4 (43%) 96.1 -0.03
22 1981 1636 124.3 +32 61.5% +0.95 2–2 (50%) 2–0 -0.38 1976 1497 98.4 60.0% -0.20 0–1 1–0 +0.09
23 1977 1468 92.6 +55 30.0% -1.30 1–1 0–2 +0.80
24 1978 1529 110.5 +90 60.0% +0.47 2–1 (67%) 0–2 +0.66
25 1979 1522 100.3 +38 42.9% -0.22 2–0 1–1 +1.09
26 1980 1530 93.2 +86 39.5% -1.05 6–3 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 102.9 +0.82
27 1981 1645 121.7 -135 +159 52.2% -0.22 4–2 (67%) 1–0 +0.70
28 1982 1634 121.9 -162 +124 44.4% -0.58 3–4 (43%) 1–0 +0.14
29 1983 1584 95.2 0.0% -3.00 +0.36
Career 1694 129.4 -73 -22 +28 48.9% +0.14 9–10 (47%) 5–7 (42%) 96.9 +3.23 1686 111.6 -150 +38 +121 45.1% -0.57 18–12 (60%) 6–8 (43%) 103.5 +5.90

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.