H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Diane Morrison vs Susan Hagey H2H: 2-0

Diane Morrison holds a 2–0 lead over Susan Hagey in their WTA head-to-head. They have met 2 times in main draws. Most recently, Diane Morrison won the 1981 Porto Alegre round of 32 6-0 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Diane Morrison
USA Age 68
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Susan Hagey
USA Age 74

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Diane Morrison 6-0 6-0 Susan Hagey Match data Apr 9, 1981* R32 Porto Alegre WTA 250 —
Diane Morrison 6-2 6-3 Susan Hagey Match data Mar 27, 1981* R16 Salvador WTA 250 —

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Diane Morrison — — — 1,694 41 43 48.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Susan Hagey — — — 1,600 25 25 50.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Diane Morrison Susan Hagey
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,520 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1974 0–1 0.0% — 1,504 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1977 1–1 50.0% — 1,507 0 0 1970 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0
20 1979 17–11 60.7% — 1,675 0 1 1972 2–2 50.0% — 1,486 0 0
21 1980 9–22 29.0% — 1,593 0 1 1973 3–2 60.0% — 1,506 0 0
22 1981 12–7 63.2% — 1,636 0 1 1974 10–6 62.5% — 1,565 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 1975 2–1 66.7% — 1,583 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 1977 0–3 0.0% — 1,564 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 1978 1–1 50.0% — 1,563 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 1979 1–0 100.0% — 1,576 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 1980 1–4 20.0% — 1,524 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 1981 3–4 42.9% — 1,512 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 1982 2–0 100.0% — 1,545 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,538 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Diane Morrison Susan Hagey
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1973 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1974 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1979 2 2 4 50.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1972 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1980 1 8 9 11.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 6 7 14.3% 1973 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1981 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1974 7 3 10 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 6 13 19 31.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 14 14 28 50.0% 2 7 9 22.2% — 12 11 23 52.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Diane Morrison Susan Hagey
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1973 1521 107.5 — — — — +81 — — 57.1% +1.28 1–0 0–1 — +0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1974 1504 99.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1977 1508 111.9 — — — — — — — 60.0% +1.60 0–1 — — +0.04 1970 1492 95.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.01
20 1979 1676 136.8 — — — — -18 -22 -41 59.0% +1.03 3–2 (60%) 0–2 — +1.94 1972 1486 93.2 — — — — +54 — — 40.0% -1.20 2–0 — — +0.93
21 1980 1594 117.4 — — — — -123 — +90 31.9% -1.27 3–4 (43%) 3–4 (43%) 96.1 -0.03 1973 1507 100.9 — — — — +72 — — 50.0% +0.42 2–0 0–1 — +1.39
22 1981 1636 124.3 — — — — — — +32 61.5% +0.95 2–2 (50%) 2–0 — -0.38 1974 1565 114.1 — — — — +120 — — 63.9% +1.00 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.0 +4.52
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1584 102.0 — — — — — — -9 50.0% +0.75 2–0 0–1 — +0.27
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1565 101.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.15
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1563 100.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -1.34 1–1 2–0 — 0.00
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1576 102.7 — — — — — — — 66.7% +2.33 1–0 — — +0.19
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1525 95.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.58 0–2 1–0 — +0.23
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1513 92.3 — — — — — — — 42.9% -1.71 — 2–0 — -0.11
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1545 107.2 — — — — — — — 100.0% +3.25 — — — +0.20
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1538 99.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.02
Career — 1694 129.4 — — — — -73 -22 +28 48.9% +0.14 9–10 (47%) 5–7 (42%) 96.9 +3.23 — 1601 102.8 — — — — +97 — -9 48.7% -0.28 9–6 (60%) 6–4 (60%) 104.1 +14.88

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.