H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Dianne Evers vs Barbara Hallquist H2H: 1-0

Dianne Evers holds a 1–0 lead over Barbara Hallquist in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dianne Evers leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Dianne Evers won the 1979 Sydney International round of 32 6-2 4-6 6-2.

H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dianne Evers 6-2 4-6 6-2 Barbara Hallquist Match data Dec 20, 1979* R32 Sydney International WTA 500 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dianne Evers 1,607 34 59 36.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Barbara Hallquist 1,777 67 90 42.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dianne Evers Barbara Hallquist
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1973 2–1 66.7% 1,516 0 0
17 1974 0–3 0.0% 1,469 0 0 1974 2–3 40.0% 1,500 0 0
18 1975 1–8 11.1% 1,413 0 0 1975 3–1 75.0% 1,541 0 0
19 1976 8–9 47.1% 1,506 0 0 1976 0–1 0.0% 1,530 0 0
20 1977 10–8 55.6% 1,600 0 0 1977 4–2 66.7% 1,577 0 0
21 1978 6–12 33.3% 1,594 0 0 1978 8–9 47.1% 1,615 0 0
22 1979 3–12 20.0% 1,533 0 0 1979 3–13 18.8% 1,564 0 0
23 1980 6–7 46.2% 1,576 0 0 1980 14–13 51.9% 1,702 0 0
24 1981 14–17 45.2% 1,736 0 0
25 1982 12–14 46.2% 1,706 0 0
26 1983 5–16 23.8% 1,567 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dianne Evers Barbara Hallquist
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1973 2 1 3 66.7%
17 1974 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1974 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1975 0 3 3 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1975 3 1 4 75.0%
19 1976 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1976 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1977 6 6 12 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1977 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1979 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1979 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1980 3 2 5 60.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1980 7 8 15 46.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
24 1981 7 6 13 53.8% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 5 5 0.0%
25 1982 7 5 12 58.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
26 1983 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
Career 1 2 3 33.3% 13 21 34 38.2% 13 29 42 31.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 34 38 72 47.2% 3 12 15 20.0% 22 28 50 44.0% 1 9 10 10.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dianne Evers Barbara Hallquist
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1973 1516 110.1 +80 66.7% +2.33 +0.83
17 1974 1470 103.1 0.0% -3.67 -0.06 1974 1500 97.3 +94 38.5% -0.85 2–1 (67%) 0–1 +1.26
18 1975 1413 104.5 +44 +68 22.2% -1.44 0–2 +0.41 1975 1541 102.9 +36 60.0% +0.60 2–0 1–1 +0.62
19 1976 1506 110.8 +125 +1 45.9% -0.19 4–1 (80%) 1–0 +2.36 1976 1530 102.4 33.3% -1.00 0–1 +0.08
20 1977 1601 119.4 -50 -69 53.7% +0.58 3–2 (60%) 0–1 +2.02 1977 1578 113.0 57.1% +0.21 2–0 1–0 +0.31
21 1978 1595 116.6 -66 -37 36.8% -1.03 2–2 (50%) 1–0 +0.04 1978 1615 117.4 +32 -43 48.6% -0.16 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) +0.27
22 1979 1534 114.2 +98 -11 -25 21.9% -1.69 1–1 0–1 +0.22 1979 1564 114.4 +88 -66 27.0% -1.76 3–4 (43%) 0–1 -0.88
23 1980 1576 122.6 -16 -51 51.7% +0.17 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 99.8 -0.47 1980 1702 131.2 -29 -211 -89 52.4% -0.19 4–5 (44%) 6–1 (86%) 104.8 -1.74
24 1981 1736 128.2 -10 -69 43.2% -0.74 8–4 (67%) 2–0 -2.03
25 1982 1707 102.0 -3 -250 -62 44.1% -0.80 5–2 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 102.8 -0.61
26 1983 1567 105.0 +48 -95 +32 28.3% -1.37 1–3 (25%) 0–3 (0%) 93.9 +0.68
Career 1607 120.5 +117 -25 -26 39.3% -0.59 12–11 (52%) 4–3 (57%) 103.7 +4.97 1777 121.4 +20 -188 -52 43.1% -0.66 30–22 (58%) 16–12 (57%) 106.6 -0.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.