H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC

Dianne Evers vs Jo Durie H2H: 1-1

Dianne Evers and Jo Durie are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Dianne Evers leads 1–0 on carpet, while Jo Durie leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jo Durie won the 1977 Hampstead quarterfinal 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dianne Evers

AUS Age 69

H2H

1 – 1

2 main-draw meetings

Jo Durie

GBR Age 66 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

Player	Score	Player	Match Data	Date	Round	Tournament	Category	Surface
Jo Durie	6-1 6-1	Dianne Evers	Match data	Apr 16, 1977*	QF	Hampstead	WTA 250	Clay
Dianne Evers	3-6 8-6 6-2	Jo Durie	Match data	Oct 8, 1976*	R16	Bournemouth Indoors	WTA 250	Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000 including documented historical predecessor categories	Finals	500 including documented historical predecessor categories	250 including documented historical predecessor categories	Titles
Dianne Evers	—	—	—	1,607	34	59	36.6%	0	0	0	0	0	0
Jo Durie	#302	#5	31	2,101	311	263	54.2%	0	0	0	1	8	9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Dianne Evers							Jo Durie
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
14	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1975	1–1	50.0%	—	1,498	0	0
15	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1976	5–6	45.5%	—	1,503	0	0
16	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1977	11–7	61.1%	—	1,602	0	0
17	1974	0–3	0.0%	—	1,469	0	0	1978	15–9	62.5%	—	1,619	0	1
18	1975	1–8	11.1%	—	1,413	0	0	1979	15–8	65.2%	—	1,713	0	3
19	1976	8–9	47.1%	—	1,506	0	0	1980	21–14	60.0%	—	1,733	0	4
20	1977	10–8	55.6%	—	1,600	0	0	1981	30–14	68.2%	—	1,859	0	7
21	1978	6–12	33.3%	—	1,594	0	0	1982	25–20	55.6%	—	1,841	0	7
22	1979	3–12	20.0%	—	1,533	0	0	1983	47–18	72.3%	#6	2,094	0	9
23	1980	6–7	46.2%	—	1,576	0	0	1984	16–15	51.6%	#24	1,890	0	9
24	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1985	17–19	47.2%	#26	1,800	0	9
25	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1986	24–17	58.5%	#24	1,841	0	9
26	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1987	10–17	37.0%	#73	1,741	0	9
27	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1988	19–19	50.0%	#60	1,702	0	9
28	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1989	8–13	38.1%	#117	1,621	0	9
29	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1990	13–13	50.0%	#64	1,673	0	9
30	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1991	15–18	45.5%	#62	1,708	0	9
31	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1992	13–16	44.8%	#59	1,688	0	9
32	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1993	4–12	25.0%	#192	1,563	0	9
33	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1994	1–4	20.0%	#348	1,555	0	9
34	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1995	1–3	25.0%	#292	1,548	0	9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age	Dianne Evers																	Jo Durie
	Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet				Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet
	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %
14	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1975	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—
15	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1976	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	2	1	3	66.7%	3	4	7	42.9%
16	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1977	—	—	—	—	5	4	9	55.6%	4	2	6	66.7%	—	—	—	—
17	1974	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	1978	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	2	3	5	40.0%	3	2	5	60.0%
18	1975	—	—	—	—	0	3	3	0.0%	1	5	6	16.7%	—	—	—	—	1979	—	—	—	—	6	2	8	75.0%	1	3	4	25.0%	1	1	2	50.0%
19	1976	—	—	—	—	3	3	6	50.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	4	3	7	57.1%	1980	—	—	—	—	13	6	19	68.4%	8	4	12	66.7%	0	4	4	0.0%
20	1977	—	—	—	—	6	6	12	50.0%	4	2	6	66.7%	—	—	—	—	1981	4	2	6	66.7%	7	4	11	63.6%	6	5	11	54.5%	3	3	6	50.0%
21	1978	—	—	—	—	1	3	4	25.0%	4	7	11	36.4%	—	—	—	—	1982	4	3	7	57.1%	5	3	8	62.5%	10	6	16	62.5%	6	8	14	42.9%
22	1979	1	2	3	33.3%	0	3	3	0.0%	1	6	7	14.3%	—	—	—	—	1983	12	3	15	80.0%	9	3	12	75.0%	16	4	20	80.0%	10	8	18	55.6%
23	1980	—	—	—	—	3	2	5	60.0%	3	5	8	37.5%	—	—	—	—	1984	2	4	6	33.3%	2	4	6	33.3%	8	4	12	66.7%	4	3	7	57.1%
24	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1985	4	7	11	36.4%	1	3	4	25.0%	9	6	15	60.0%	3	3	6	50.0%
25	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1986	10	6	16	62.5%	3	2	5	60.0%	4	3	7	57.1%	7	6	13	53.8%
26	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1987	3	5	8	37.5%	1	2	3	33.3%	5	5	10	50.0%	1	5	6	16.7%
27	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1988	9	9	18	50.0%	1	2	3	33.3%	7	5	12	58.3%	2	3	5	40.0%
28	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1989	6	9	15	40.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	2	2	4	50.0%	0	1	1	0.0%
29	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1990	6	6	12	50.0%	—	—	—	—	7	4	11	63.6%	0	3	3	0.0%
30	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1991	7	9	16	43.8%	0	3	3	0.0%	3	3	6	50.0%	5	3	8	62.5%
31	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1992	3	7	10	30.0%	3	2	5	60.0%	6	3	9	66.7%	1	4	5	20.0%
32	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1993	2	4	6	33.3%	0	2	2	0.0%	1	2	3	33.3%	1	4	5	20.0%
33	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1994	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	0	3	3	0.0%	—	—	—	—
34	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1995	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1	3	4	25.0%	—	—	—	—
Career	—	1	2	3	33.3%	13	21	34	38.2%	13	29	42	31.0%	4	3	7	57.1%	—	73	75	148	49.3%	57	45	102	55.9%	103	72	175	58.9%	50	65	115	43.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age	Dianne Evers																Jo Durie
Age	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule
14	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1975	1499	100.0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	40.0%	+0.20	1–0	0–1	—	+0.55
15	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1976	1503	107.8	—	—	—	—	+73	—	+94	54.2%	+0.71	1–3 (25%)	1–0	—	+3.14
16	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1977	1602	121.5	—	—	—	—	—	-35	+40	56.1%	+0.71	4–1 (80%)	0–1	—	+2.47
17	1974	1470	103.1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-3.67	—	—	—	-0.06	1978	1619	121.0	—	—	—	—	+18	—	-9	57.4%	+0.50	5–1 (83%)	1–2 (33%)	104.3	+2.99
18	1975	1413	104.5	—	—	—	—	—	+44	+68	22.2%	-1.44	0–2	—	—	+0.41	1979	1714	129.5	—	—	—	—	—	-76	-94	58.5%	+0.36	6–1 (86%)	6–2 (75%)	110.0	+0.87
19	1976	1506	110.8	—	—	—	—	+125	+1	—	45.9%	-0.19	4–1 (80%)	1–0	—	+2.36	1980	1734	122.7	—	—	—	—	-184	-10	-56	61.7%	+0.60	5–8 (38%)	4–1 (80%)	99.6	+0.68
20	1977	1601	119.4	—	—	—	—	—	-50	-69	53.7%	+0.58	3–2 (60%)	0–1	—	+2.02	1981	1859	136.3	—	—	—	—	-159	-77	-116	60.8%	+0.60	12–2 (86%)	4–1 (80%)	113.5	-0.98
21	1978	1595	116.6	—	—	—	—	—	-66	-37	36.8%	-1.03	2–2 (50%)	1–0	—	+0.04	1982	1841	141.1	—	—	—	—	-59	-75	-37	55.1%	+0.21	8–9 (47%)	2–4 (33%)	97.4	-2.62
22	1979	1534	114.2	—	—	—	—	+98	-11	-25	21.9%	-1.69	1–1	0–1	—	+0.22	1983	2095	159.8	—	—	—	—	-75	-184	-99	69.3%	+1.31	7–5 (58%)	3–2 (60%)	104.6	-5.64
23	1980	1576	122.6	—	—	—	—	—	-16	-51	51.7%	+0.17	2–3 (40%)	2–1 (67%)	99.8	-0.47	1984	1891	136.3	—	—	—	—	+11	-59	+84	49.3%	+0.53	7–4 (64%)	1–5 (17%)	95.2	+0.18
24	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1985	1800	133.3	—	—	—	—	+15	-48	+123	48.8%	+0.06	7–7 (50%)	1–4 (20%)	96.7	-1.37
25	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1986	1842	140.0	—	—	—	—	+2	-79	+45	55.7%	+0.21	11–6 (65%)	8–3 (73%)	105.1	-3.56
26	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1987	1741	134.1	—	—	—	—	+30	-30	+108	41.0%	-0.69	2–5 (29%)	2–2 (50%)	96.3	-2.72
27	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1988	1703	127.8	—	—	—	—	-1	-16	+119	49.4%	-0.10	6–5 (55%)	8–4 (67%)	101.9	-0.26
28	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1989	1622	126.0	—	—	—	—	-8	—	+201	41.3%	-0.67	1–3 (25%)	3–2 (60%)	98.1	+0.38
29	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1990	1674	130.7	—	—	—	—	-60	—	+193	51.7%	+0.48	2–6 (25%)	3–5 (38%)	93.4	+0.04
30	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1991	1709	132.3	—	—	—	—	+4	-111	+94	45.5%	-0.12	6–7 (46%)	1–2 (33%)	100.5	+1.02
31	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1992	1689	130.7	—	—	—	—	-48	-50	+162	50.0%	-0.09	3–7 (30%)	4–1 (80%)	99.1	+0.39
32	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1993	1563	107.8	—	—	—	—	-11	—	—	35.9%	-0.74	3–6 (33%)	0–4 (0%)	92.1	+1.33
33	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1994	1555	106.0	—	—	—	—	—	—	+191	33.3%	-1.42	0–2	—	—	-0.60
34	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1995	1548	107.6	—	—	—	—	—	—	+141	40.0%	-0.60	0–2	1–0	—	-0.20
Career	—	1607	120.5	—	—	—	—	+117	-25	-26	39.3%	-0.59	12–11 (52%)	4–3 (57%)	103.7	+4.97	—	2101	141.6	—	—	—	—	-26	-67	+43	53.6%	+0.27	97–90 (52%)	53–46 (54%)	102.6	-0.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.

Dianne Evers's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Sue Mappin	2	3	5	Jun 21, 1978	H2H
Chris Oneil	1	2	3	Jun 11, 1980	H2H
Brenda Catton	1	1	2	Dec 3, 1980	H2H
Rene Blount	2	0	2	Jun 10, 1980	H2H
Glynis Coles	1	1	2	Apr 9, 1980	H2H

Jo Durie's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Helena Sukova	3	10	13	Aug 14, 1992	H2H
Rosalyn Fairbank	8	5	13	Jul 21, 1990	H2H
Martina Navratilova	0	12	12	Feb 2, 1991	H2H
Pam Shriver	2	9	11	Aug 1, 1991	H2H
Anne Hobbs	4	5	9	May 28, 1986	H2H