H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Dianne Evers vs Sue Saliba H2H: 0-1

Sue Saliba holds a 1–0 lead over Dianne Evers in their WTA head-to-head. They have met 1 times in main draws. Most recently, Sue Saliba won the 1978 Turin quarterfinal 6-1 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dianne Evers
AUS Age 69
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Sue Saliba
AUS Age 68

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sue Saliba 6-1 6-0 Dianne Evers Match data Apr 15, 1978* QF Turin WTA 250 —

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dianne Evers — — — 1,607 34 59 36.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sue Saliba — — — 1,767 69 63 52.3% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dianne Evers Sue Saliba
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1974 0–3 0.0% — 1,469 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1975 1–8 11.1% — 1,413 0 0 1976 2–3 40.0% — 1,516 0 0
19 1976 8–9 47.1% — 1,506 0 0 1977 10–10 50.0% — 1,564 0 1
20 1977 10–8 55.6% — 1,600 0 0 1978 6–7 46.2% — 1,553 0 1
21 1978 6–12 33.3% — 1,594 0 0 1979 9–9 50.0% — 1,570 0 1
22 1979 3–12 20.0% — 1,533 0 0 1980 34–17 66.7% — 1,707 0 3
23 1980 6–7 46.2% — 1,576 0 0 1981 8–16 33.3% — 1,617 0 3
24 — — — — — — — 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,608 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dianne Evers Sue Saliba
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1974 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1975 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 1976 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 1976 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1977 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 7 12 41.7% — — — —
20 1977 — — — — 6 6 12 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1978 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — —
21 1978 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 1979 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — —
22 1979 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 1980 3 5 8 37.5% 13 6 19 68.4% 12 6 18 66.7% — — — —
23 1980 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1981 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 1 2 3 33.3% 13 21 34 38.2% 13 29 42 31.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — 6 11 17 35.3% 22 14 36 61.1% 32 33 65 49.2% 0 2 2 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dianne Evers Sue Saliba
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1974 1470 103.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.67 — — — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1975 1413 104.5 — — — — — +44 +68 22.2% -1.44 0–2 — — +0.41 1976 1517 103.0 — — — — — +50 — 38.5% -0.77 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +0.15
19 1976 1506 110.8 — — — — +125 +1 — 45.9% -0.19 4–1 (80%) 1–0 — +2.36 1977 1565 109.0 — — — — — +65 -60 51.1% -0.15 3–4 (43%) — — +2.53
20 1977 1601 119.4 — — — — — -50 -69 53.7% +0.58 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — +2.02 1978 1553 104.6 — — — — — — +1 48.3% -0.62 1–2 (33%) — — +1.36
21 1978 1595 116.6 — — — — — -66 -37 36.8% -1.03 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +0.04 1979 1571 105.8 — — — — — +17 +7 47.6% 0.00 4–2 (67%) 0–2 — +2.49
22 1979 1534 114.2 — — — — +98 -11 -25 21.9% -1.69 1–1 0–1 — +0.22 1980 1708 124.6 — — — — -165 -31 -2 62.7% +1.09 7–3 (70%) 5–4 (56%) 105.6 +2.25
23 1980 1576 122.6 — — — — — -16 -51 51.7% +0.17 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 99.8 -0.47 1981 1617 108.1 — — — — -60 +46 +39 41.8% -0.89 3–6 (33%) 1–3 (25%) — +1.84
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1608 95.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.02
Career — 1607 120.5 — — — — +117 -25 -26 39.3% -0.59 12–11 (52%) 4–3 (57%) 103.7 +4.97 — 1768 115.2 — — — — -109 +4 -3 52.0% +0.09 20–18 (53%) 6–10 (38%) 98.6 +8.09

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.