H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Dianne Evers vs Terry Holladay H2H: 0-2

Terry Holladay holds a 2–0 lead over Dianne Evers in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Terry Holladay leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Terry Holladay won the 1975 Beckenham second round 8-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dianne Evers
Age 69
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Terry Holladay
USA Age 70 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 11, 1975* Beckenham WTA 250 R64 Grass Terry Holladay 8-6 6-4 Dianne Evers Match data
May 14, 1975* Bournemouth WTA 250 R64 Clay Terry Holladay 6-0 6-4 Dianne Evers Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Dianne Evers — — — 1,603 34 59 36.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Terry Holladay #395 #39 7 1,935 179 199 47.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dianne Evers Terry Holladay
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1970 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1972 2–3 40.0% — 1,473 0 0
17 1974 0–3 0.0% — 1,469 0 0 1973 4–2 66.7% — 1,507 0 0
18 1975 1–8 11.1% — 1,414 0 0 1974 12–17 41.4% — 1,566 0 0
19 1976 8–9 47.1% — 1,495 0 0 1975 32–23 58.2% — 1,751 0 0
20 1977 10–8 55.6% — 1,596 0 0 1976 28–20 58.3% — 1,876 0 1
21 1978 6–12 33.3% — 1,590 0 0 1977 15–15 50.0% — 1,932 0 1
22 1979 3–12 20.0% — 1,531 0 0 1978 2–8 20.0% — 1,837 0 1
23 1980 6–7 46.2% — 1,567 0 0 1979 17–18 48.6% — 1,822 0 1
24 — — — — — — — 1980 25–21 54.3% — 1,822 0 1
25 — — — — — — — 1981 4–12 25.0% — 1,672 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 1982 0–2 0.0% — 1,638 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 1983 9–8 52.9% — 1,679 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 1984 15–16 48.4% #50 1,677 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 1985 9–16 36.0% — 1,608 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 1986 5–8 38.5% #103 1,612 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 1987 0–9 0.0% #315 1,500 0 1