H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Dianne Fromholtz vs Anne Smith H2H: 4-1
Dianne Fromholtz holds a 4–1 lead over Anne Smith in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Dianne Fromholtz leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Dianne Fromholtz won the 1989 Sydney second round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 69
Left-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
4
–
1
5 main draw meetings
Age 67
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 1989* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Dianne Fromholtz | 6-3 6-3 | Anne Smith | Match data |
| Aug 11, 1988* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Dianne Fromholtz | 6-2 7-6 | Anne Smith | Match data |
| Sep 3, 1981* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Anne Smith | 6-3 6-3 | Dianne Fromholtz | Match data |
| Mar 6, 1980* | Dallas | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Dianne Fromholtz | 6-2 6-4 | Anne Smith | Match data |
| May 17, 1979* | Vienna | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Dianne Fromholtz | 6-2 6-3 | Anne Smith | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dianne Fromholtz | #306 | #19 | 34 | 2,167 | 466 | 282 | 62.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 21 | 22 |
| Anne Smith | — | — | — | 2,050 | 221 | 173 | 56.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dianne Fromholtz | Anne Smith | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1972 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1973 | 57–13 | 81.4% | — | 1,911 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1974 | 52–20 | 72.2% | — | 1,963 | 0 | 16 | 1977 | 8–3 | 72.7% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1975 | 34–29 | 54.0% | — | 1,906 | 0 | 16 | 1978 | 14–7 | 66.7% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1976 | 39–13 | 75.0% | — | 2,063 | 0 | 19 | 1979 | 28–28 | 50.0% | — | 1,847 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1977 | 32–18 | 64.0% | — | 2,074 | 0 | 19 | 1980 | 21–21 | 50.0% | — | 1,866 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1978 | 28–13 | 68.3% | — | 2,049 | 0 | 21 | 1981 | 36–25 | 59.0% | — | 1,934 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1979 | 57–27 | 67.9% | — | 2,005 | 0 | 22 | 1982 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1980 | 46–21 | 68.7% | — | 2,009 | 0 | 22 | 1983 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,897 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1981 | 13–19 | 40.6% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 22 | 1984 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1982 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,786 | 0 | 22 | 1985 | 10–4 | 71.4% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1983 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 22 | 1986 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1984 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,717 | 0 | 22 | 1987 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1985 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,794 | 0 | 22 | 1988 | 8–8 | 50.0% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1986 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #25 | 1,818 | 0 | 22 | 1989 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,848 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1987 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #21 | 1,850 | 0 | 22 | 1990 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,827 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1988 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #56 | 1,749 | 0 | 22 | 1991 | 8–5 | 61.5% | — | 1,820 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 1989 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #131 | 1,674 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #306 | 1,631 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |