H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Dianne Fromholtz vs Barbara Hallquist H2H: 1-0

Dianne Fromholtz holds a 1–0 lead over Barbara Hallquist in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dianne Fromholtz leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Dianne Fromholtz won the 1979 Wimbledon round of 128 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dianne Fromholtz
AUS Age 70 Left-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Barbara Hallquist
USA Age 69

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dianne Fromholtz 6-3 6-2 Barbara Hallquist Match data Jun 27, 1979* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dianne Fromholtz — #5 34 2,184 466 283 62.2% 0 0 0 2 20 22
Barbara Hallquist — — — 1,778 67 90 42.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dianne Fromholtz Barbara Hallquist
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1971 0–1 0.0% — 1,487 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1972 7–7 50.0% — 1,545 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1973 57–13 81.4% — 1,910 0 12 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,516 0 0
17 1974 52–20 72.2% — 1,971 0 16 1974 2–3 40.0% — 1,500 0 0
18 1975 34–29 54.0% — 1,904 0 16 1975 3–1 75.0% — 1,541 0 0
19 1976 39–13 75.0% #5 2,085 0 19 1976 0–1 0.0% — 1,530 0 0
20 1977 32–18 64.0% #8 2,083 0 19 1977 4–2 66.7% — 1,577 0 0
21 1978 28–13 68.3% #10 2,079 0 21 1978 8–9 47.1% — 1,616 0 0
22 1979 57–28 67.1% #6 2,016 0 22 1979 3–13 18.8% — 1,565 0 0
23 1980 46–21 68.7% — 2,015 0 22 1980 14–13 51.9% — 1,703 0 0
24 1981 13–19 40.6% — 1,740 0 22 1981 14–17 45.2% — 1,737 0 0
25 1982 16–15 51.6% — 1,786 0 22 1982 12–14 46.2% — 1,707 0 0
26 1983 7–13 35.0% — 1,691 0 22 1983 5–16 23.8% — 1,567 0 0
27 1984 3–3 50.0% — 1,717 0 22 — — — — — — —
28 1985 17–17 50.0% — 1,794 0 22 — — — — — — —
29 1986 19–14 57.6% #25 1,836 0 22 — — — — — — —
30 1987 19–13 59.4% #21 1,863 0 22 — — — — — — —
31 1988 14–14 50.0% #56 1,754 0 22 — — — — — — —
32 1989 6–10 37.5% #131 1,677 0 22 — — — — — — —
33 1990 0–2 0.0% — 1,634 0 22 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dianne Fromholtz Barbara Hallquist
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1971 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1972 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 — — — — 26 2 28 92.9% 30 11 41 73.2% — — — — 1973 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1974 14 2 16 87.5% 13 7 20 65.0% 19 9 28 67.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1974 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 1975 8 8 16 50.0% 22 12 34 64.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1975 — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
19 1976 5 2 7 71.4% 10 1 11 90.9% 14 5 19 73.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1977 8 5 13 61.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 10 5 15 66.7% 10 6 16 62.5% 1977 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1978 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 17 3 20 85.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 1979 13 10 23 56.5% 8 3 11 72.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 29 11 40 72.5% 1979 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1980 9 4 13 69.2% 4 1 5 80.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 27 14 41 65.9% 1980 7 8 15 46.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
24 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1981 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 7 6 13 53.8% 0 5 5 0.0%
25 1982 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1982 7 5 12 58.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — —
26 1983 0 3 3 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1983 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 1984 — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1985 8 6 14 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1986 9 6 15 60.0% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 6 3 9 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1988 9 10 19 47.4% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1989 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1990 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 104 81 185 56.2% 109 50 159 68.6% 142 76 218 65.1% 103 74 177 58.2% — 34 38 72 47.2% 3 12 15 20.0% 22 28 50 44.0% 1 9 10 10.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dianne Fromholtz Barbara Hallquist
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1971 1488 95.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1972 1546 117.1 — — — — — +12 +28 53.3% 0.00 0–2 3–1 (75%) — +0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 1910 143.9 — — — — — +42 -25 74.7% +1.75 13–3 (81%) 5–2 (71%) 111.9 +5.47 1973 1516 110.1 — — — — +80 — — 66.7% +2.33 — — — +0.83
17 1974 1972 156.1 — — — — -98 -39 -12 69.8% +1.51 10–7 (59%) 8–4 (67%) 105.3 -4.03 1974 1500 97.3 — — — — +94 — — 38.5% -0.85 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +1.26
18 1975 1904 154.9 — — — — -40 +48 -25 53.8% +0.55 8–6 (57%) 2–8 (20%) 95.3 -9.51 1975 1541 102.9 — — — — — — +36 60.0% +0.60 2–0 1–1 — +0.62
19 1976 2085 162.7 — — — — -18 -56 -78 70.3% +1.52 9–7 (56%) 2–3 (40%) 101.2 -5.29 1976 1530 102.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.08
20 1977 2083 161.6 — — — — +1 -67 -19 61.5% +0.94 8–7 (53%) 6–4 (60%) 100.3 -4.49 1977 1578 113.0 — — — — — — — 57.1% +0.21 2–0 1–0 — +0.30
21 1978 2080 150.6 — — — — -65 — +71 65.6% +0.99 9–3 (75%) 4–3 (57%) 103.7 -3.63 1978 1616 117.7 — — — — +29 — -43 48.6% -0.16 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.13
22 1979 2016 168.3 — — — — +50 +21 +53 66.3% +1.40 8–12 (40%) 9–7 (56%) 96.6 -3.31 1979 1566 114.8 — — — — +87 — -68 27.0% -1.76 3–4 (43%) 0–1 — -0.92
23 1980 2015 158.3 — — — — +38 +67 +55 69.3% +1.36 5–7 (42%) 4–2 (67%) 98.3 -3.29 1980 1704 131.6 — — — — -27 -213 -91 52.4% -0.19 4–5 (44%) 6–1 (86%) 104.8 -1.47
24 1981 1740 124.8 — — — — +183 +184 +193 42.6% -0.43 1–5 (17%) 3–2 (60%) 91.7 +0.43 1981 1737 128.5 — — — — -9 — -69 43.2% -0.74 8–4 (67%) 2–0 — -2.02
25 1982 1787 139.0 — — — — +85 +108 +114 48.5% -0.40 5–3 (63%) 4–0 (100%) 103.3 -1.68 1982 1708 102.3 — — — — -1 -251 -62 44.1% -0.80 5–2 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 102.9 -0.55
26 1983 1691 131.0 — — — — +58 +169 — 42.6% -0.34 1–6 (14%) 1–5 (17%) 88.7 -0.67 1983 1568 105.1 — — — — +49 -96 +31 28.3% -1.37 1–3 (25%) 0–3 (0%) 93.9 +0.62
27 1984 1718 126.0 — — — — — — +184 50.0% +0.36 1–1 0–2 — -0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1985 1794 143.9 — — — — -40 — +133 47.2% +0.17 4–4 (50%) 0–3 (0%) — -2.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1986 1837 143.3 — — — — -10 — +86 55.6% +0.28 6–2 (75%) 4–6 (40%) 103.1 -2.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 1863 138.0 — — — — -28 -92 +94 56.7% +0.54 5–0 (100%) 2–2 (50%) 105.7 -0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1988 1754 120.9 — — — — -21 — +153 49.3% -0.09 6–5 (55%) 1–3 (25%) 96.5 +1.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1989 1677 121.0 — — — — -25 — +183 43.6% -0.41 2–5 (29%) — — -0.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1990 1634 101.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–2 0–1 — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2184 157.2 — — — — +7 +45 +35 60.7% +0.84 101–87 (54%) 58–58 (50%) 98.6 -4.59 — 1778 121.7 — — — — +21 -189 -53 43.1% -0.66 30–22 (58%) 16–12 (57%) 106.7 -0.71

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.