H2H data updated: 2026-09-10 00:00 UTC

Dianne Fromholtz vs Barbara Potter H2H: 0-1

Barbara Potter holds a 1–0 lead over Dianne Fromholtz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Barbara Potter leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Barbara Potter won the 1985 Melbourne round of 32 3-6 6-3 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dianne Fromholtz
AUS Age 70 Left-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Barbara Potter
USA Age 64 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Barbara Potter 3-6 6-3 7-6 Dianne Fromholtz Match data May 16, 1985* R32 Melbourne WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dianne Fromholtz #306 #5 34 2,181 466 282 62.3% 0 0 0 2 20 22
Barbara Potter #112 #8 63 2,096 299 190 61.1% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dianne Fromholtz Barbara Potter
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1971 0–1 0.0% — 1,487 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1972 7–7 50.0% — 1,545 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1973 57–13 81.4% — 1,910 0 12 1978 4–7 36.4% — 1,533 0 0
17 1974 52–20 72.2% — 1,971 0 16 1979 8–22 26.7% — 1,620 0 0
18 1975 34–29 54.0% — 1,903 0 16 1980 23–21 52.3% — 1,864 0 0
19 1976 39–13 75.0% #5 2,069 0 19 1981 47–23 67.1% #10 1,941 0 0
20 1977 32–18 64.0% #8 2,077 0 19 1982 43–22 66.2% #8 1,997 0 2
21 1978 28–13 68.3% #10 2,076 0 21 1983 28–20 58.3% — 1,850 0 2
22 1979 57–27 67.9% #6 2,015 0 22 1984 35–17 67.3% #12 1,952 0 2
23 1980 46–21 68.7% — 2,013 0 22 1985 31–16 66.0% #15 1,899 0 3
24 1981 13–19 40.6% — 1,739 0 22 1986 14–10 58.3% #26 1,881 0 3
25 1982 16–15 51.6% — 1,785 0 22 1987 25–13 65.8% #12 1,895 0 4
26 1983 7–13 35.0% — 1,690 0 22 1988 36–14 72.0% #10 1,918 0 5
27 1984 3–3 50.0% #138 1,717 0 22 1989 5–5 50.0% #106 1,844 0 5
28 1985 17–17 50.0% #97 1,793 0 22 — — — — — — —
29 1986 19–14 57.6% #25 1,836 0 22 — — — — — — —
30 1987 19–13 59.4% #21 1,863 0 22 — — — — — — —
31 1988 14–14 50.0% #56 1,754 0 22 — — — — — — —
32 1989 6–10 37.5% #131 1,676 0 22 — — — — — — —
33 1990 0–2 0.0% #306 1,633 0 22 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dianne Fromholtz Barbara Potter
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1971 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1972 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 — — — — 26 2 28 92.9% 30 11 41 73.2% — — — — 1978 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
17 1974 14 2 16 87.5% 13 7 20 65.0% 19 9 28 67.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1979 4 8 12 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 8 11 27.3%
18 1975 8 8 16 50.0% 22 12 34 64.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1980 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 15 13 28 53.6%
19 1976 5 2 7 71.4% 10 1 11 90.9% 14 5 19 73.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 1981 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — 12 6 18 66.7% 27 14 41 65.9%
20 1977 8 5 13 61.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 10 5 15 66.7% 10 6 16 62.5% 1982 5 5 10 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 28 10 38 73.7%
21 1978 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 17 3 20 85.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1983 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 10 8 18 55.6%
22 1979 13 9 22 59.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 29 11 40 72.5% 1984 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — 11 4 15 73.3% 17 9 26 65.4%
23 1980 9 4 13 69.2% 4 1 5 80.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 27 14 41 65.9% 1985 12 4 16 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 9 7 16 56.3%
24 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1986 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0%
25 1982 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1987 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 17 7 24 70.8%
26 1983 0 3 3 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1988 25 9 34 73.5% — — — — 9 3 12 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
27 1984 — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1989 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1985 8 6 14 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1986 9 6 15 60.0% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 6 3 9 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1988 9 10 19 47.4% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1989 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1990 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 104 80 184 56.5% 109 50 159 68.6% 142 76 218 65.1% 103 74 177 58.2% — 89 54 143 62.2% 5 8 13 38.5% 68 39 107 63.6% 137 89 226 60.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dianne Fromholtz Barbara Potter
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1971 1488 95.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1972 1546 117.1 — — — — — +12 +28 53.3% 0.00 0–2 3–1 (75%) — +0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 1910 143.9 — — — — — +42 -25 74.7% +1.75 13–3 (81%) 5–2 (71%) 111.9 +5.78 1978 1533 114.2 — — — — +62 — +55 35.7% -1.14 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +1.22
17 1974 1972 156.1 — — — — -99 -39 -12 69.8% +1.51 10–7 (59%) 8–4 (67%) 105.3 -4.10 1979 1620 143.0 — — — — +30 -114 -40 30.3% -0.89 4–6 (40%) 1–8 (11%) 95.5 -1.88
18 1975 1904 154.9 — — — — -41 +47 -26 53.8% +0.55 8–6 (57%) 2–8 (20%) 95.3 -8.56 1980 1864 154.9 — — — — +9 — -289 54.5% +0.43 3–10 (23%) 5–4 (56%) 96.7 -0.89
19 1976 2070 160.7 — — — — -35 -42 -62 70.3% +1.52 9–7 (56%) 2–3 (40%) 101.1 -4.76 1981 1941 150.3 — — — — -3 — -143 63.1% +0.79 12–7 (63%) 9–10 (47%) 101.8 -1.85
20 1977 2077 161.3 — — — — -7 -60 -13 61.5% +0.94 8–7 (53%) 6–4 (60%) 100.5 -4.48 1982 1997 162.5 — — — — +57 — -125 63.3% +0.89 10–7 (59%) 12–14 (46%) 102.4 -2.63
21 1978 2076 150.6 — — — — -68 — +76 65.6% +0.99 9–3 (75%) 4–3 (57%) 103.8 -3.03 1983 1851 139.2 — — — — +53 -245 +13 58.6% +0.77 6–9 (40%) 8–8 (50%) 93.1 +1.42
22 1979 2016 167.5 — — — — +50 +20 +54 66.9% +1.45 8–11 (42%) 9–7 (56%) 97.0 -2.87 1984 1952 157.5 — — — — -8 — -14 67.0% +1.24 3–7 (30%) 8–4 (67%) 94.3 -1.32
23 1980 2013 158.0 — — — — +36 +66 +56 69.3% +1.36 5–7 (42%) 4–2 (67%) 98.3 -2.56 1985 1900 142.4 — — — — -8 -289 +64 61.9% +0.74 8–7 (53%) 12–5 (71%) 102.4 +0.26
24 1981 1739 124.8 — — — — +183 +184 +193 42.6% -0.43 1–5 (17%) 3–2 (60%) 91.7 +0.06 1986 1881 145.2 — — — — +12 — — 56.1% +0.37 4–5 (44%) 5–4 (56%) 100.5 -2.11
25 1982 1786 138.8 — — — — +84 +108 +114 48.5% -0.40 5–3 (63%) 4–0 (100%) 103.3 -1.49 1987 1895 145.4 — — — — +28 — — 64.3% +0.85 6–4 (60%) 7–2 (78%) 102.9 +1.54
26 1983 1691 130.9 — — — — +57 +168 — 42.6% -0.34 1–6 (14%) 1–5 (17%) 88.7 -0.64 1988 1919 147.3 — — — — +6 — +51 71.4% +1.21 4–8 (33%) 12–3 (80%) 100.4 +1.81
27 1984 1717 126.0 — — — — — — +184 50.0% +0.36 1–1 0–2 — -0.60 1989 1845 116.8 — — — — -10 — — 52.2% -0.09 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 96.3 +0.54
28 1985 1794 143.8 — — — — -42 — +133 47.2% +0.17 4–4 (50%) 0–3 (0%) — -2.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1986 1836 143.2 — — — — -9 — +88 55.6% +0.28 6–2 (75%) 4–6 (40%) 103.1 -2.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 1863 138.0 — — — — -29 -91 +94 56.7% +0.54 5–0 (100%) 2–2 (50%) 105.7 -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1988 1754 120.9 — — — — -21 — +154 49.3% -0.09 6–5 (55%) 1–3 (25%) 96.5 +1.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1989 1677 120.9 — — — — -25 — +183 43.6% -0.41 2–5 (29%) — — -0.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1990 1634 101.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–2 0–1 — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2182 156.8 — — — — +4 +46 +38 60.7% +0.84 101–86 (54%) 58–58 (50%) 98.8 -4.11 — 2096 155.7 — — — — +17 -225 -44 59.9% +0.67 65–74 (47%) 81–65 (55%) 98.8 -0.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.