H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Dianne Fromholtz vs Camille Benjamin H2H: 0-1

Camille Benjamin holds a 1–0 lead over Dianne Fromholtz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Camille Benjamin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Camille Benjamin won the 1983 Mahwah round of 64 6-4 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dianne Fromholtz
AUS Age 70 Left-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Camille Benjamin
USA Age 60 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Camille Benjamin 6-4 7-6 Dianne Fromholtz Match data Aug 24, 1983* R64 Mahwah WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dianne Fromholtz — #5 34 2,184 466 283 62.2% 0 0 0 2 20 22
Camille Benjamin — #27 13 1,821 177 223 44.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dianne Fromholtz Camille Benjamin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1971 0–1 0.0% — 1,487 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1972 7–7 50.0% — 1,545 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1973 57–13 81.4% — 1,910 0 12 1982 21–14 60.0% — 1,689 0 0
17 1974 52–20 72.2% — 1,971 0 16 1983 22–25 46.8% — 1,715 0 0
18 1975 34–29 54.0% — 1,904 0 16 1984 28–27 50.9% #33 1,767 0 0
19 1976 39–13 75.0% #5 2,085 0 19 1985 22–29 43.1% #62 1,629 0 0
20 1977 32–18 64.0% #8 2,083 0 19 1986 19–26 42.2% #79 1,608 0 0
21 1978 28–13 68.3% #10 2,079 0 21 1987 23–24 48.9% #67 1,654 0 0
22 1979 57–28 67.1% #6 2,016 0 22 1988 14–23 37.8% #91 1,600 0 0
23 1980 46–21 68.7% — 2,015 0 22 1989 14–20 41.2% #92 1,651 0 0
24 1981 13–19 40.6% — 1,740 0 22 1990 10–18 35.7% #136 1,620 0 0
25 1982 16–15 51.6% — 1,786 0 22 1991 2–8 20.0% #225 1,559 0 0
26 1983 7–13 35.0% — 1,691 0 22 1992 1–5 16.7% #251 1,527 0 0
27 1984 3–3 50.0% — 1,717 0 22 1993 1–3 25.0% — 1,516 0 0
28 1985 17–17 50.0% — 1,794 0 22 1994 0–1 0.0% #251 1,503 0 0
29 1986 19–14 57.6% #25 1,836 0 22 — — — — — — —
30 1987 19–13 59.4% #21 1,863 0 22 — — — — — — —
31 1988 14–14 50.0% #56 1,754 0 22 — — — — — — —
32 1989 6–10 37.5% #131 1,677 0 22 — — — — — — —
33 1990 0–2 0.0% — 1,634 0 22 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dianne Fromholtz Camille Benjamin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1971 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1972 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 — — — — 26 2 28 92.9% 30 11 41 73.2% — — — — 1982 14 8 22 63.6% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
17 1974 14 2 16 87.5% 13 7 20 65.0% 19 9 28 67.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1983 7 10 17 41.2% 8 7 15 53.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
18 1975 8 8 16 50.0% 22 12 34 64.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1984 10 9 19 52.6% 11 8 19 57.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 5 6 16.7%
19 1976 5 2 7 71.4% 10 1 11 90.9% 14 5 19 73.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 1985 14 12 26 53.8% 2 7 9 22.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 6 9 33.3%
20 1977 8 5 13 61.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 10 5 15 66.7% 10 6 16 62.5% 1986 10 10 20 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
21 1978 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 17 3 20 85.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1987 12 9 21 57.1% 5 7 12 41.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1979 13 10 23 56.5% 8 3 11 72.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 29 11 40 72.5% 1988 10 14 24 41.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1980 9 4 13 69.2% 4 1 5 80.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 27 14 41 65.9% 1989 10 12 22 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1990 5 10 15 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1982 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1991 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
26 1983 0 3 3 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1992 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1984 — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1993 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1985 8 6 14 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1994 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 1986 9 6 15 60.0% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 6 3 9 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1988 9 10 19 47.4% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1989 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1990 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 104 81 185 56.2% 109 50 159 68.6% 142 76 218 65.1% 103 74 177 58.2% — 95 106 201 47.3% 41 51 92 44.6% 24 37 61 39.3% 12 27 39 30.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dianne Fromholtz Camille Benjamin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1971 1488 95.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1972 1546 117.1 — — — — — +12 +28 53.3% 0.00 0–2 3–1 (75%) — +0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 1910 143.9 — — — — — +42 -25 74.7% +1.75 13–3 (81%) 5–2 (71%) 111.9 +5.47 1982 1690 123.6 — — — — +58 — -145 54.9% +0.38 9–5 (64%) 5–3 (63%) 105.7 +0.09
17 1974 1972 156.1 — — — — -98 -39 -12 69.8% +1.51 10–7 (59%) 8–4 (67%) 105.3 -4.03 1983 1716 124.5 — — — — -16 -37 -117 45.0% -0.65 11–8 (58%) 10–5 (67%) 107.6 -1.48
18 1975 1904 154.9 — — — — -40 +48 -25 53.8% +0.55 8–6 (57%) 2–8 (20%) 95.3 -9.51 1984 1768 138.9 — — — — -53 -5 -97 49.6% +0.05 9–10 (47%) 7–8 (47%) 100.2 -4.31
19 1976 2085 162.7 — — — — -18 -56 -78 70.3% +1.52 9–7 (56%) 2–3 (40%) 101.2 -5.29 1985 1629 116.9 — — — — +23 +3 +11 44.6% -0.60 4–8 (33%) 7–3 (70%) 102.2 +2.67
20 1977 2083 161.6 — — — — +1 -67 -19 61.5% +0.94 8–7 (53%) 6–4 (60%) 100.3 -4.49 1986 1609 118.7 — — — — -5 +36 +19 43.4% -0.36 8–8 (50%) 4–11 (27%) 96.1 +1.68
21 1978 2080 150.6 — — — — -65 — +71 65.6% +0.99 9–3 (75%) 4–3 (57%) 103.7 -3.63 1987 1655 128.4 — — — — -4 -9 +6 46.8% -0.24 13–6 (68%) 3–5 (38%) 107.2 -0.10
22 1979 2016 168.3 — — — — +50 +21 +53 66.3% +1.40 8–12 (40%) 9–7 (56%) 96.6 -3.31 1988 1601 121.0 — — — — -5 +27 +18 41.7% -0.76 5–7 (42%) 4–4 (50%) 98.5 +0.03
23 1980 2015 158.3 — — — — +38 +67 +55 69.3% +1.36 5–7 (42%) 4–2 (67%) 98.3 -3.29 1989 1652 129.0 — — — — +3 -23 -85 43.9% -0.34 6–8 (43%) 1–8 (11%) 92.9 -1.46
24 1981 1740 124.8 — — — — +183 +184 +193 42.6% -0.43 1–5 (17%) 3–2 (60%) 91.7 +0.43 1990 1620 116.6 — — — — -24 +20 -56 32.2% -1.46 4–1 (80%) 4–4 (50%) 103.5 -1.55
25 1982 1787 139.0 — — — — +85 +108 +114 48.5% -0.40 5–3 (63%) 4–0 (100%) 103.3 -1.68 1991 1560 107.1 — — — — -32 +85 — 28.6% -1.90 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.18
26 1983 1691 131.0 — — — — +58 +169 — 42.6% -0.34 1–6 (14%) 1–5 (17%) 88.7 -0.67 1992 1528 113.1 — — — — -19 — — 23.1% -2.54 0–1 0–1 — -0.34
27 1984 1718 126.0 — — — — — — +184 50.0% +0.36 1–1 0–2 — -0.61 1993 1517 101.5 — — — — -10 — — 25.0% -2.25 — 0–1 — +0.04
28 1985 1794 143.9 — — — — -40 — +133 47.2% +0.17 4–4 (50%) 0–3 (0%) — -2.28 1994 1503 100.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.11
29 1986 1837 143.3 — — — — -10 — +86 55.6% +0.28 6–2 (75%) 4–6 (40%) 103.1 -2.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 1863 138.0 — — — — -28 -92 +94 56.7% +0.54 5–0 (100%) 2–2 (50%) 105.7 -0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1988 1754 120.9 — — — — -21 — +153 49.3% -0.09 6–5 (55%) 1–3 (25%) 96.5 +1.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1989 1677 121.0 — — — — -25 — +183 43.6% -0.41 2–5 (29%) — — -0.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1990 1634 101.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–2 0–1 — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2184 157.2 — — — — +7 +45 +35 60.7% +0.84 101–87 (54%) 58–58 (50%) 98.6 -4.59 — 1822 128.5 — — — — -2 +2 -49 44.3% -0.48 70–64 (52%) 46–54 (46%) 102.4 -1.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.