H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Dianne Fromholtz vs Catarina Lindqvist Ryan H2H: 2-2
Dianne Fromholtz and Catarina Lindqvist Ryan are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Dianne Fromholtz leads 2–1 on carpet, while Catarina Lindqvist Ryan leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Dianne Fromholtz won the 1988 Tokyo Pan Pacific third round 6-3 1-6 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 69
Left-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 1988* | Tokyo Pan Pacific | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Dianne Fromholtz | 6-3 1-6 6-0 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
| Jul 2, 1986* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 7-6 7-5 | Dianne Fromholtz | Match data |
| Mar 7, 1986* | Princeton | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Dianne Fromholtz | 7-5 6-4 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
| Mar 14, 1985* | Dallas | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-3 6-3 | Dianne Fromholtz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dianne Fromholtz | #306 | #19 | 34 | 2,167 | 466 | 282 | 62.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 21 | 22 |
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | — | — | — | 1,989 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Dianne Fromholtz | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 1972 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 57–13 | 81.4% | — | 1,911 | 0 | 12 | 1982 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 52–20 | 72.2% | — | 1,963 | 0 | 16 | 1983 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 1975 | 34–29 | 54.0% | — | 1,906 | 0 | 16 | 1984 | 28–16 | 63.6% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 |
| 1976 | 39–13 | 75.0% | — | 2,063 | 0 | 19 | 1985 | 44–18 | 71.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 3 |
| 1977 | 32–18 | 64.0% | — | 2,074 | 0 | 19 | 1986 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 3 |
| 1978 | 28–13 | 68.3% | — | 2,049 | 0 | 21 | 1987 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 3 |
| 1979 | 57–27 | 67.9% | — | 2,005 | 0 | 22 | 1988 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,798 | 0 | 3 |
| 1980 | 46–21 | 68.7% | — | 2,009 | 0 | 22 | 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 3 |
| 1981 | 13–19 | 40.6% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 22 | 1990 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 4 |
| 1982 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,786 | 0 | 22 | 1991 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 5 |
| 1983 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 22 | 1992 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 5 |
| 1984 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,717 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,794 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #25 | 1,818 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #21 | 1,850 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #56 | 1,749 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #131 | 1,674 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #306 | 1,631 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |