H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Dianne Fromholtz vs Chris Evert H2H: 3-14

Chris Evert holds a 14–3 lead over Dianne Fromholtz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 17 main-draw meetings, Chris Evert leads 6–2 on carpet and 5–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chris Evert won the 1985 Australian Open round of 16 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dianne Fromholtz
AUS Age 70 Left-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
3 – 14
17 main-draw meetings
Chris Evert
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Chris Evert #2 6-4 6-1 Dianne Fromholtz Match data Dec 4, 1985* R16 Australian Open Grand Slam Grass
Chris Evert 6-1 6-4 Dianne Fromholtz Match data Jan 12, 1980* SF Cincinnati Open WTA 250 Carpet
Chris Evert 6-1 6-4 Dianne Fromholtz Match data Jan 5, 1980* R32 Landover WTA 250 Carpet
Chris Evert 6-1 6-3 Dianne Fromholtz Match data Jun 9, 1979* SF Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Chris Evert 3-6 6-3 6-1 Dianne Fromholtz Match data Apr 1, 1979 F Clairol Crown (la Costa) WTA 250 Hard
Dianne Fromholtz 6-2 6-3 Chris Evert Match data Mar 21, 1979 RR WTA Finals WTA Finals Carpet
Chris Evert 7-6 6-0 Dianne Fromholtz Match data Jan 13, 1979* SF Oakland WTA 250 Carpet
Dianne Fromholtz 7-6(3) 6-4 Chris Evert Match data Nov 1, 1977 RR Palm Springs WTA 250 Grass
Chris Evert 6-3 6-2 Dianne Fromholtz Match data Oct 9, 1977* F Atlanta WTA 250 Carpet
Chris Evert 6-3 6-4 Dianne Fromholtz Match data Mar 19, 1977* QF Philadelphia WTA 250 Hard
Chris Evert 6-1 7-5 Dianne Fromholtz Match data Oct 10, 1976* F Phoenix WTA 250 Hard
Chris Evert 6-1 3-6 6-4 Dianne Fromholtz Match data Apr 2, 1976* QF Philadelphia WTA 250 Carpet
Dianne Fromholtz 2-6 6-2 6-3 Chris Evert Match data Mar 25, 1976* R32 Boston WTA 250 Carpet
Chris Evert 6-0 6-1 Dianne Fromholtz Match data Oct 4, 1975* SF Mission Viejo WTA 250 Hard
Chris Evert 6-3 6-4 Dianne Fromholtz Match data Aug 10, 1975* F Indianapolis WTA 250 Clay
Chris Evert 6-0 6-3 Dianne Fromholtz Match data Mar 6, 1975* R32 Boston WTA 250 Carpet
Chris Evert 6-2 6-3 Dianne Fromholtz Match data Jan 31, 1975* R16 Washington Open WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dianne Fromholtz — #5 34 2,184 466 283 62.2% 0 0 0 2 20 22
Chris Evert — #1 231 2,617 1,246 158 88.7% 18 0 5 19 112 154

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dianne Fromholtz Chris Evert
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1971 0–1 0.0% — 1,487 0 0 1969 4–2 66.7% — 1,560 0 0
15 1972 7–7 50.0% — 1,545 0 0 1970 14–4 77.8% — 1,744 0 0
16 1973 57–13 81.4% — 1,910 0 12 1971 28–2 93.3% — 2,003 0 4
17 1974 52–20 72.2% — 1,971 0 16 1972 45–8 84.9% — 2,249 0 8
18 1975 34–29 54.0% — 1,904 0 16 1973 86–9 90.5% — 2,374 0 20
19 1976 39–13 75.0% #5 2,085 0 19 1974 100–7 93.5% — 2,459 2 36
20 1977 32–18 64.0% #8 2,083 0 19 1975 88–7 92.6% #1 2,560 4 52
21 1978 28–13 68.3% #10 2,079 0 21 1976 71–5 93.4% #1 2,566 6 64
22 1979 57–28 67.1% #6 2,016 0 22 1977 63–4 94.0% #1 2,580 7 75
23 1980 46–21 68.7% — 2,015 0 22 1978 49–4 92.5% #2 2,614 8 82
24 1981 13–19 40.6% — 1,740 0 22 1979 82–14 85.4% #2 2,444 9 90
25 1982 16–15 51.6% — 1,786 0 22 1980 66–9 88.0% #1 2,471 11 98
26 1983 7–13 35.0% — 1,691 0 22 1981 65–9 87.8% #1 2,480 12 107
27 1984 3–3 50.0% — 1,717 0 22 1982 67–6 91.8% #2 2,497 14 117
28 1985 17–17 50.0% — 1,794 0 22 1983 59–11 84.3% #2 2,403 15 123
29 1986 19–14 57.6% #25 1,836 0 22 1984 68–8 89.5% #2 2,412 16 129
30 1987 19–13 59.4% #21 1,863 0 22 1985 78–8 90.7% #2 2,434 17 139
31 1988 14–14 50.0% #56 1,754 0 22 1986 56–6 90.3% #2 2,425 18 145
32 1989 6–10 37.5% #131 1,677 0 22 1987 68–12 85.0% #3 2,336 18 150
33 1990 0–2 0.0% — 1,634 0 22 1988 62–13 82.7% #3 2,286 18 154
34 — — — — — — — 1989 27–10 73.0% #10 2,167 18 154

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dianne Fromholtz Chris Evert
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1971 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1969 — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — —
15 1972 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 1970 — — — — 14 2 16 87.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
16 1973 — — — — 26 2 28 92.9% 30 11 41 73.2% — — — — 1971 — — — — 20 1 21 95.2% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — —
17 1974 14 2 16 87.5% 13 7 20 65.0% 19 9 28 67.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1972 3 1 4 75.0% 19 2 21 90.5% 18 3 21 85.7% 5 2 7 71.4%
18 1975 8 8 16 50.0% 22 12 34 64.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1973 17 1 18 94.4% 46 4 50 92.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 8 0 8 100.0%
19 1976 5 2 7 71.4% 10 1 11 90.9% 14 5 19 73.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 1974 19 1 20 95.0% 42 0 42 100.0% 24 2 26 92.3% 14 4 18 77.8%
20 1977 8 5 13 61.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 10 5 15 66.7% 10 6 16 62.5% 1975 27 2 29 93.1% 37 0 37 100.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 18 3 21 85.7%
21 1978 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 17 3 20 85.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1976 15 1 16 93.8% 11 0 11 100.0% 13 0 13 100.0% 31 4 35 88.6%
22 1979 13 10 23 56.5% 8 3 11 72.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 29 11 40 72.5% 1977 12 0 12 100.0% 12 0 12 100.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 31 2 33 93.9%
23 1980 9 4 13 69.2% 4 1 5 80.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 27 14 41 65.9% 1978 17 0 17 100.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 17 2 19 89.5%
24 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1979 19 4 23 82.6% 20 1 21 95.2% 12 1 13 92.3% 31 8 39 79.5%
25 1982 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1980 17 0 17 100.0% 16 0 16 100.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 23 8 31 74.2%
26 1983 0 3 3 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1981 15 2 17 88.2% 25 1 26 96.2% 16 1 17 94.1% 9 5 14 64.3%
27 1984 — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1982 24 1 25 96.0% 23 2 25 92.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 10 2 12 83.3%
28 1985 8 6 14 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1983 19 3 22 86.4% 22 0 22 100.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 16 7 23 69.6%
29 1986 9 6 15 60.0% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 1984 21 1 22 95.5% 24 3 27 88.9% 16 2 18 88.9% 7 2 9 77.8%
30 1987 6 3 9 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1985 21 2 23 91.3% 22 1 23 95.7% 16 2 18 88.9% 19 3 22 86.4%
31 1988 9 10 19 47.4% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 1986 21 2 23 91.3% 20 1 21 95.2% 5 1 6 83.3% 10 2 12 83.3%
32 1989 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1987 18 5 23 78.3% 23 2 25 92.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 18 3 21 85.7%
33 1990 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 33 6 39 84.6% 13 2 15 86.7% 5 1 6 83.3% 11 4 15 73.3%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 14 5 19 73.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 1 1 2 50.0%
Career — 104 81 185 56.2% 109 50 159 68.6% 142 76 218 65.1% 103 74 177 58.2% — 332 37 369 90.0% 423 26 449 94.2% 209 33 242 86.4% 279 62 341 81.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dianne Fromholtz Chris Evert
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1971 1488 95.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.21 1969 1560 117.6 — — — — — +24 — 63.6% +1.18 0–1 — — +0.13
15 1972 1546 117.1 — — — — — +12 +28 53.3% 0.00 0–2 3–1 (75%) — +0.81 1970 1745 152.4 — — — — — +83 — 77.1% +2.63 0–1 2–0 — -0.34
16 1973 1910 143.9 — — — — — +42 -25 74.7% +1.75 13–3 (81%) 5–2 (71%) 111.9 +5.47 1971 2004 157.6 — — — — — +17 -224 85.9% +3.36 5–1 (83%) 2–2 (50%) 107.3 +1.65
17 1974 1972 156.1 — — — — -98 -39 -12 69.8% +1.51 10–7 (59%) 8–4 (67%) 105.3 -4.03 1972 2250 173.8 — — — — -437 +32 -205 82.6% +2.69 5–2 (71%) 5–2 (71%) 107.2 -8.05
18 1975 1904 154.9 — — — — -40 +48 -25 53.8% +0.55 8–6 (57%) 2–8 (20%) 95.3 -9.51 1973 2374 178.1 — — — — -194 +102 -190 87.7% +3.21 8–3 (73%) 8–2 (80%) 110.6 -5.25
19 1976 2085 162.7 — — — — -18 -56 -78 70.3% +1.52 9–7 (56%) 2–3 (40%) 101.2 -5.29 1974 2460 181.1 — — — — -66 +155 -101 88.4% +3.39 12–4 (75%) 3–6 (33%) 101.3 -5.58
20 1977 2083 161.6 — — — — +1 -67 -19 61.5% +0.94 8–7 (53%) 6–4 (60%) 100.3 -4.49 1975 2561 182.1 — — — — -54 +157 -241 88.9% +3.34 9–3 (75%) 7–2 (78%) 105.5 -5.39
21 1978 2080 150.6 — — — — -65 — +71 65.6% +0.99 9–3 (75%) 4–3 (57%) 103.7 -3.63 1976 2567 181.1 — — — — +42 +122 -103 87.8% +3.12 10–2 (83%) 8–4 (67%) 102.4 -3.25
22 1979 2016 168.3 — — — — +50 +21 +53 66.3% +1.40 8–12 (40%) 9–7 (56%) 96.6 -3.31 1977 2581 181.8 — — — — +147 +142 -83 90.7% +3.33 5–1 (83%) 4–1 (80%) 104.4 -2.71
23 1980 2015 158.3 — — — — +38 +67 +55 69.3% +1.36 5–7 (42%) 4–2 (67%) 98.3 -3.29 1978 2615 179.6 — — — — +109 +62 -113 87.1% +3.14 9–3 (75%) 1–1 — -2.67
24 1981 1740 124.8 — — — — +183 +184 +193 42.6% -0.43 1–5 (17%) 3–2 (60%) 91.7 +0.43 1979 2445 178.7 — — — — +15 +298 +73 81.0% +2.77 13–2 (87%) 3–4 (43%) 99.7 -3.77
25 1982 1787 139.0 — — — — +85 +108 +114 48.5% -0.40 5–3 (63%) 4–0 (100%) 103.3 -1.68 1980 2472 177.7 — — — — +82 +339 +114 82.6% +2.79 13–0 (100%) 2–4 (33%) 105.0 -4.52
26 1983 1691 131.0 — — — — +58 +169 — 42.6% -0.34 1–6 (14%) 1–5 (17%) 88.7 -0.67 1981 2480 182.5 — — — — +11 +299 +140 86.3% +3.09 9–2 (82%) 7–1 (88%) 105.5 -4.00
27 1984 1718 126.0 — — — — — — +184 50.0% +0.36 1–1 0–2 — -0.61 1982 2497 179.5 — — — — +60 +259 +77 88.4% +3.34 6–3 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 97.9 -4.08
28 1985 1794 143.9 — — — — -40 — +133 47.2% +0.17 4–4 (50%) 0–3 (0%) — -2.28 1983 2404 176.6 — — — — +46 +319 +184 79.9% +2.28 10–3 (77%) 6–3 (67%) 97.9 -4.42
29 1986 1837 143.3 — — — — -10 — +86 55.6% +0.28 6–2 (75%) 4–6 (40%) 103.1 -2.36 1984 2412 175.6 — — — — +69 +210 +144 82.8% +2.90 11–2 (85%) 2–4 (33%) 99.2 -4.58
30 1987 1863 138.0 — — — — -28 -92 +94 56.7% +0.54 5–0 (100%) 2–2 (50%) 105.7 -0.46 1985 2434 176.7 — — — — +28 +244 +130 86.0% +2.88 10–4 (71%) 4–2 (67%) 98.7 -3.85
31 1988 1754 120.9 — — — — -21 — +153 49.3% -0.09 6–5 (55%) 1–3 (25%) 96.5 +1.13 1986 2426 177.4 — — — — +7 +245 +117 83.6% +2.78 10–0 (100%) 4–3 (57%) 104.6 -3.46
32 1989 1677 121.0 — — — — -25 — +183 43.6% -0.41 2–5 (29%) — — -0.73 1987 2336 176.4 — — — — +22 +298 +206 81.9% +2.62 7–6 (54%) 4–1 (80%) 96.1 -4.70
33 1990 1634 101.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–2 0–1 — +0.25 1988 2287 173.9 — — — — +33 +322 +236 79.0% +2.37 11–2 (85%) 5–4 (56%) 101.1 -3.78
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 2168 158.7 — — — — +39 +352 +268 73.8% +1.59 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 93.3 -2.27
Career — 2184 157.2 — — — — +7 +45 +35 60.7% +0.84 101–87 (54%) 58–58 (50%) 98.6 -4.59 — 2617 182.2 — — — — +20 +195 0 84.6% +2.92 166–50 (77%) 85–50 (63%) 106.2 -5.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.