H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Dianne Fromholtz vs Chris Evert H2H: 3-12

Chris Evert holds a 12–3 lead over Dianne Fromholtz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 15 main-draw meetings, Chris Evert leads 6–2 on carpet and 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chris Evert won the 1985 Australian Open round of 16 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dianne Fromholtz
AUS Age 70 Left-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
3 – 12
15 main-draw meetings
Chris Evert
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Chris Evert #2 6-4 6-1 Dianne Fromholtz Match data Dec 4, 1985* R16 Australian Open Grand Slam Grass
Chris Evert 6-1 6-4 Dianne Fromholtz Match data Jan 12, 1980* SF Cincinnati Open WTA 250 Carpet
Chris Evert 6-1 6-4 Dianne Fromholtz Match data Jan 5, 1980* R32 Landover WTA 250 Carpet
Chris Evert 6-1 6-3 Dianne Fromholtz Match data Jun 9, 1979* SF Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Dianne Fromholtz 6-2 6-3 Chris Evert Match data Mar 21, 1979 RR WTA Finals WTA Finals Carpet
Chris Evert 7-6 6-0 Dianne Fromholtz Match data Jan 13, 1979* SF Oakland WTA 250 Carpet
Dianne Fromholtz 7-6(3) 6-4 Chris Evert Match data Nov 1, 1977 RR Palm Springs WTA 250 Grass
Chris Evert 6-3 6-2 Dianne Fromholtz Match data Oct 9, 1977* F Atlanta WTA 250 Carpet
Chris Evert 6-3 6-4 Dianne Fromholtz Match data Mar 19, 1977* QF Philadelphia WTA 250 Hard
Chris Evert 6-1 3-6 6-4 Dianne Fromholtz Match data Apr 2, 1976* QF Philadelphia WTA 250 Carpet
Dianne Fromholtz 2-6 6-2 6-3 Chris Evert Match data Mar 25, 1976* R32 Boston WTA 250 Carpet
Chris Evert 6-0 6-1 Dianne Fromholtz Match data Oct 4, 1975* SF Mission Viejo WTA 250 Hard
Chris Evert 6-3 6-4 Dianne Fromholtz Match data Aug 10, 1975* F Indianapolis WTA 250 Clay
Chris Evert 6-0 6-3 Dianne Fromholtz Match data Mar 6, 1975* R32 Boston WTA 250 Carpet
Chris Evert 6-2 6-3 Dianne Fromholtz Match data Jan 27, 1975 R16 Washington Open WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dianne Fromholtz #306 #5 34 2,181 466 282 62.3% 0 0 0 2 20 22
Chris Evert #10 #1 231 2,610 1,228 158 88.6% 18 0 5 13 112 154

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dianne Fromholtz Chris Evert
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1971 0–1 0.0% — 1,487 0 0 1969 4–2 66.7% — 1,560 0 1
15 1972 7–7 50.0% — 1,545 0 0 1970 14–4 77.8% — 1,744 0 4
16 1973 57–13 81.4% — 1,910 0 12 1971 28–2 93.3% — 2,003 0 11
17 1974 52–20 72.2% — 1,971 0 16 1972 45–8 84.9% — 2,249 0 15
18 1975 34–29 54.0% — 1,903 0 16 1973 86–9 90.5% — 2,374 0 27
19 1976 39–13 75.0% #5 2,069 0 19 1974 97–7 93.3% — 2,450 2 40
20 1977 32–18 64.0% #8 2,077 0 19 1975 85–7 92.4% #1 2,544 4 53
21 1978 28–13 68.3% #10 2,076 0 21 1976 63–5 92.6% #1 2,545 6 62
22 1979 57–27 67.9% #6 2,015 0 22 1977 63–4 94.0% #1 2,568 7 73
23 1980 46–21 68.7% — 2,013 0 22 1978 49–4 92.5% #2 2,607 8 80
24 1981 13–19 40.6% — 1,739 0 22 1979 81–14 85.3% #2 2,440 9 87
25 1982 16–15 51.6% — 1,785 0 22 1980 66–9 88.0% #1 2,468 11 95
26 1983 7–13 35.0% — 1,690 0 22 1981 64–9 87.7% #1 2,475 12 103
27 1984 3–3 50.0% #138 1,717 0 22 1982 66–6 91.7% #2 2,491 14 112
28 1985 17–17 50.0% #97 1,793 0 22 1983 59–11 84.3% #2 2,400 15 118
29 1986 19–14 57.6% #25 1,836 0 22 1984 68–8 89.5% #2 2,409 16 124
30 1987 19–13 59.4% #21 1,863 0 22 1985 77–8 90.6% #2 2,428 17 133
31 1988 14–14 50.0% #56 1,754 0 22 1986 56–6 90.3% #2 2,422 18 139
32 1989 6–10 37.5% #131 1,676 0 22 1987 68–12 85.0% #3 2,334 18 144
33 1990 0–2 0.0% #306 1,633 0 22 1988 62–13 82.7% #3 2,285 18 148
34 — — — — — — — 1989 27–10 73.0% #10 2,167 18 148

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dianne Fromholtz Chris Evert
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1971 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1969 — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — —
15 1972 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 1970 — — — — 14 2 16 87.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
16 1973 — — — — 26 2 28 92.9% 30 11 41 73.2% — — — — 1971 — — — — 20 1 21 95.2% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — —
17 1974 14 2 16 87.5% 13 7 20 65.0% 19 9 28 67.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1972 3 1 4 75.0% 19 2 21 90.5% 18 3 21 85.7% 5 2 7 71.4%
18 1975 8 8 16 50.0% 22 12 34 64.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1973 17 1 18 94.4% 46 4 50 92.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 8 0 8 100.0%
19 1976 5 2 7 71.4% 10 1 11 90.9% 14 5 19 73.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 1974 19 1 20 95.0% 40 0 40 100.0% 24 2 26 92.3% 14 4 18 77.8%
20 1977 8 5 13 61.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 10 5 15 66.7% 10 6 16 62.5% 1975 26 2 28 92.9% 36 0 36 100.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 18 3 21 85.7%
21 1978 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 17 3 20 85.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1976 12 1 13 92.3% 11 0 11 100.0% 9 0 9 100.0% 31 4 35 88.6%
22 1979 13 9 22 59.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 29 11 40 72.5% 1977 12 0 12 100.0% 12 0 12 100.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 31 2 33 93.9%
23 1980 9 4 13 69.2% 4 1 5 80.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 27 14 41 65.9% 1978 17 0 17 100.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 17 2 19 89.5%
24 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1979 18 4 22 81.8% 20 1 21 95.2% 12 1 13 92.3% 31 8 39 79.5%
25 1982 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1980 17 0 17 100.0% 16 0 16 100.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 23 8 31 74.2%
26 1983 0 3 3 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1981 14 2 16 87.5% 25 1 26 96.2% 16 1 17 94.1% 9 5 14 64.3%
27 1984 — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1982 24 1 25 96.0% 22 2 24 91.7% 10 1 11 90.9% 10 2 12 83.3%
28 1985 8 6 14 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1983 19 3 22 86.4% 22 0 22 100.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 16 7 23 69.6%
29 1986 9 6 15 60.0% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 1984 21 1 22 95.5% 24 3 27 88.9% 16 2 18 88.9% 7 2 9 77.8%
30 1987 6 3 9 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1985 21 2 23 91.3% 21 1 22 95.5% 16 2 18 88.9% 19 3 22 86.4%
31 1988 9 10 19 47.4% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 1986 21 2 23 91.3% 20 1 21 95.2% 5 1 6 83.3% 10 2 12 83.3%
32 1989 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1987 18 5 23 78.3% 23 2 25 92.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 18 3 21 85.7%
33 1990 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 33 6 39 84.6% 13 2 15 86.7% 5 1 6 83.3% 11 4 15 73.3%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 14 5 19 73.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 1 1 2 50.0%
Career — 104 80 184 56.5% 109 50 159 68.6% 142 76 218 65.1% 103 74 177 58.2% — 326 37 363 89.8% 418 26 444 94.1% 205 33 238 86.1% 279 62 341 81.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dianne Fromholtz Chris Evert
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1971 1488 95.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.21 1969 1560 117.6 — — — — — +24 — 63.6% +1.18 0–1 — — +0.13
15 1972 1546 117.1 — — — — — +12 +28 53.3% 0.00 0–2 3–1 (75%) — +0.81 1970 1745 152.4 — — — — — +83 — 77.1% +2.63 0–1 2–0 — -0.34
16 1973 1910 143.9 — — — — — +42 -25 74.7% +1.75 13–3 (81%) 5–2 (71%) 111.9 +5.78 1971 2004 157.6 — — — — — +17 -224 85.9% +3.36 5–1 (83%) 2–2 (50%) 107.3 +1.65
17 1974 1972 156.1 — — — — -99 -39 -12 69.8% +1.51 10–7 (59%) 8–4 (67%) 105.3 -4.10 1972 2250 173.8 — — — — -437 +32 -205 82.6% +2.69 5–2 (71%) 5–2 (71%) 107.2 -7.71
18 1975 1904 154.9 — — — — -41 +47 -26 53.8% +0.55 8–6 (57%) 2–8 (20%) 95.3 -8.56 1973 2374 178.1 — — — — -194 +102 -190 87.7% +3.21 8–3 (73%) 8–2 (80%) 110.6 -5.17
19 1976 2070 160.7 — — — — -35 -42 -62 70.3% +1.52 9–7 (56%) 2–3 (40%) 101.1 -4.76 1974 2450 180.5 — — — — -56 +162 -92 88.2% +3.37 12–4 (75%) 3–6 (33%) 101.3 -5.59
20 1977 2077 161.3 — — — — -7 -60 -13 61.5% +0.94 8–7 (53%) 6–4 (60%) 100.5 -4.48 1975 2544 181.4 — — — — -55 +162 -225 89.2% +3.37 8–3 (73%) 6–2 (75%) 104.4 -5.18
21 1978 2076 150.6 — — — — -68 — +76 65.6% +0.99 9–3 (75%) 4–3 (57%) 103.8 -3.03 1976 2546 179.8 — — — — +44 +128 -121 86.5% +3.11 10–2 (83%) 6–4 (60%) 101.6 -3.21
22 1979 2016 167.5 — — — — +50 +20 +54 66.9% +1.45 8–11 (42%) 9–7 (56%) 97.0 -2.87 1977 2568 181.6 — — — — +148 +144 -101 90.7% +3.33 5–1 (83%) 4–1 (80%) 104.6 -2.88
23 1980 2013 158.0 — — — — +36 +66 +56 69.3% +1.36 5–7 (42%) 4–2 (67%) 98.3 -2.56 1978 2608 179.5 — — — — +105 +63 -131 87.1% +3.14 9–3 (75%) 1–1 — -2.79
24 1981 1739 124.8 — — — — +183 +184 +193 42.6% -0.43 1–5 (17%) 3–2 (60%) 91.7 +0.06 1979 2440 178.4 — — — — +13 +292 +61 81.2% +2.78 12–2 (86%) 3–4 (43%) 99.2 -3.99
25 1982 1786 138.8 — — — — +84 +108 +114 48.5% -0.40 5–3 (63%) 4–0 (100%) 103.3 -1.49 1980 2469 177.6 — — — — +80 +330 +100 82.6% +2.79 13–0 (100%) 2–4 (33%) 105.1 -4.31
26 1983 1691 130.9 — — — — +57 +168 — 42.6% -0.34 1–6 (14%) 1–5 (17%) 88.7 -0.64 1981 2476 182.2 — — — — +9 +291 +130 86.1% +3.10 9–2 (82%) 7–1 (88%) 105.6 -3.95
27 1984 1717 126.0 — — — — — — +184 50.0% +0.36 1–1 0–2 — -0.60 1982 2491 179.3 — — — — +62 +255 +73 88.2% +3.33 6–3 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 98.0 -4.01
28 1985 1794 143.8 — — — — -42 — +133 47.2% +0.17 4–4 (50%) 0–3 (0%) — -2.23 1983 2400 176.5 — — — — +47 +316 +178 79.9% +2.28 10–3 (77%) 6–3 (67%) 97.9 -4.38
29 1986 1836 143.2 — — — — -9 — +88 55.6% +0.28 6–2 (75%) 4–6 (40%) 103.1 -2.32 1984 2410 175.5 — — — — +69 +207 +137 82.8% +2.90 11–2 (85%) 2–4 (33%) 99.3 -4.61
30 1987 1863 138.0 — — — — -29 -91 +94 56.7% +0.54 5–0 (100%) 2–2 (50%) 105.7 -0.34 1985 2429 176.4 — — — — +30 +241 +127 85.9% +2.88 10–4 (71%) 4–2 (67%) 98.8 -3.55
31 1988 1754 120.9 — — — — -21 — +154 49.3% -0.09 6–5 (55%) 1–3 (25%) 96.5 +1.17 1986 2423 177.3 — — — — +9 +241 +113 83.6% +2.78 10–0 (100%) 4–3 (57%) 104.6 -3.45
32 1989 1677 120.9 — — — — -25 — +183 43.6% -0.41 2–5 (29%) — — -0.70 1987 2335 176.3 — — — — +23 +294 +200 81.9% +2.62 7–6 (54%) 4–1 (80%) 96.2 -4.20
33 1990 1634 101.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–2 0–1 — +0.25 1988 2286 173.9 — — — — +34 +319 +231 79.0% +2.37 11–2 (85%) 5–4 (56%) 101.2 -3.52
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 2167 158.6 — — — — +40 +347 +265 73.8% +1.59 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 93.3 -2.18
Career — 2182 156.8 — — — — +4 +46 +38 60.7% +0.84 101–86 (54%) 58–58 (50%) 98.8 -4.11 — 2610 182.0 — — — — +21 +194 -3 84.5% +2.92 164–50 (77%) 82–50 (62%) 105.8 -5.37

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.