H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Dianne Fromholtz vs Chris Oneil H2H: 2-2
Dianne Fromholtz and Chris Oneil are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Dianne Fromholtz leads 2–1 on clay, while Chris Oneil leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Chris Oneil won the 1978 Adelaide third round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 1978* | Adelaide | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Chris Oneil | 6-3 6-1 | Dianne Fromholtz | Match data |
| Aug 8, 1974* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Dianne Fromholtz | 6-1 6-2 | Chris Oneil | Match data |
| May 24, 1974* | Bournemouth | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Dianne Fromholtz | 9-7 6-2 | Chris Oneil | Match data |
| Dec 10, 1972* | Sydney Metro 2 | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Chris Oneil | 4-6 6-2 6-2 | Dianne Fromholtz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dianne Fromholtz | #306 | #19 | 34 | 2,167 | 466 | 282 | 62.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 21 | 22 |
| Chris Oneil | — | — | — | 1,768 | 99 | 108 | 47.8% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Dianne Fromholtz | Chris Oneil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 2 |
| 1972 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 2 |
| 1973 | 57–13 | 81.4% | — | 1,911 | 0 | 12 | 1974 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 2 |
| 1974 | 52–20 | 72.2% | — | 1,963 | 0 | 16 | 1975 | 30–17 | 63.8% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 4 |
| 1975 | 34–29 | 54.0% | — | 1,906 | 0 | 16 | 1976 | 14–6 | 70.0% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 7 |
| 1976 | 39–13 | 75.0% | — | 2,063 | 0 | 19 | 1977 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,636 | 0 | 7 |
| 1977 | 32–18 | 64.0% | — | 2,074 | 0 | 19 | 1978 | 13–12 | 52.0% | — | 1,714 | 1 | 8 |
| 1978 | 28–13 | 68.3% | — | 2,049 | 0 | 21 | 1979 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,632 | 1 | 8 |
| 1979 | 57–27 | 67.9% | — | 2,005 | 0 | 22 | 1980 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,577 | 1 | 8 |
| 1980 | 46–21 | 68.7% | — | 2,009 | 0 | 22 | 1981 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,555 | 1 | 9 |
| 1981 | 13–19 | 40.6% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 22 | 1982 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,598 | 1 | 9 |
| 1982 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,786 | 0 | 22 | 1983 | 5–15 | 25.0% | — | 1,528 | 1 | 9 |
| 1983 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,717 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,794 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #25 | 1,818 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #21 | 1,850 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #56 | 1,749 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #131 | 1,674 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #306 | 1,631 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |