H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Dianne Fromholtz vs Claudia Kohde Kilsch H2H: 0-1

Claudia Kohde Kilsch holds a 1–0 lead over Dianne Fromholtz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Claudia Kohde Kilsch leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Claudia Kohde Kilsch won the 1986 Chicago third round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dianne Fromholtz
AUS Age 69 Left-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Claudia Kohde Kilsch
Age 62 Right-Handed 187 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 13, 1986* Chicago WTA 250 R32 Carpet Claudia Kohde Kilsch #7 6-3 6-4 Dianne Fromholtz #21 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Dianne Fromholtz #306 #19 34 2,167 466 282 62.3% 0 0 0 1 21 22
Claudia Kohde Kilsch #387 #4 77 2,157 401 233 63.2% 0 0 0 2 10 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dianne Fromholtz Claudia Kohde Kilsch
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
14 1971 0–1 0.0% — 1,487 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1972 7–7 50.0% — 1,546 0 0 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0
16 1973 57–13 81.4% — 1,911 0 12 1980 36–18 66.7% — 1,755 0 1
17 1974 52–20 72.2% — 1,963 0 16 1981 40–22 64.5% — 1,841 0 5
18 1975 34–29 54.0% — 1,906 0 16 1982 34–23 59.6% — 1,914 0 8
19 1976 39–13 75.0% — 2,063 0 19 1983 29–20 59.2% — 1,871 0 8
20 1977 32–18 64.0% — 2,074 0 19 1984 42–16 72.4% #8 2,014 0 9
21 1978 28–13 68.3% — 2,049 0 21 1985 49–19 72.1% #5 2,115 0 10
22 1979 57–27 67.9% — 2,005 0 22 1986 39–17 69.6% #7 2,049 0 10
23 1980 46–21 68.7% — 2,009 0 22 1987 35–16 68.6% #10 1,994 0 10
24 1981 13–19 40.6% — 1,740 0 22 1988 39–18 68.4% #12 1,952 0 11
25 1982 16–15 51.6% — 1,786 0 22 1989 16–13 55.2% #37 1,856 0 11
26 1983 7–13 35.0% — 1,691 0 22 1990 17–16 51.5% #46 1,792 0 12
27 1984 3–3 50.0% #138 1,717 0 22 1991 14–19 42.4% #85 1,682 0 12
28 1985 17–17 50.0% #97 1,794 0 22 1992 11–14 44.0% #78 1,647 0 12
29 1986 19–14 57.6% #25 1,818 0 22 — — — — — — —
30 1987 19–13 59.4% #21 1,850 0 22 — — — — — — —
31 1988 14–14 50.0% #56 1,749 0 22 — — — — — — —
32 1989 6–10 37.5% #131 1,674 0 22 — — — — — — —
33 1990 0–2 0.0% #306 1,631 0 22 — — — — — — —