H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Dianne Fromholtz vs Gabriela Sabatini H2H: 1-3
Gabriela Sabatini holds a 3–1 lead over Dianne Fromholtz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Gabriela Sabatini leads 3–0 on grass, while Dianne Fromholtz leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gabriela Sabatini won the 1989 Wimbledon first round 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 69
Left-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 56
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 1989* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Gabriela Sabatini | 6-1 6-0 | Dianne Fromholtz | Match data |
| Jun 17, 1988* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Gabriela Sabatini | 4-6 6-1 6-3 | Dianne Fromholtz | Match data |
| Jun 19, 1987* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Gabriela Sabatini | 7-5 6-4 | Dianne Fromholtz | Match data |
| Feb 13, 1986* | Boca Raton | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Dianne Fromholtz | 7-5 6-4 | Gabriela Sabatini | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dianne Fromholtz | #306 | #19 | 34 | 2,167 | 466 | 282 | 62.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 21 | 22 |
| Gabriela Sabatini | #56 | #3 | 228 | 2,398 | 607 | 182 | 76.9% | 1 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 27 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dianne Fromholtz | Gabriela Sabatini | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #74 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1972 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #12 | 1,947 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 1973 | 57–13 | 81.4% | — | 1,911 | 0 | 12 | 1986 | 49–21 | 70.0% | #9 | 2,023 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 1974 | 52–20 | 72.2% | — | 1,963 | 0 | 16 | 1987 | 62–16 | 79.5% | #6 | 2,264 | 0 | 5 |
| 18 | 1975 | 34–29 | 54.0% | — | 1,906 | 0 | 16 | 1988 | 61–13 | 82.4% | #4 | 2,276 | 0 | 9 |
| 19 | 1976 | 39–13 | 75.0% | — | 2,063 | 0 | 19 | 1989 | 58–12 | 82.9% | #3 | 2,257 | 0 | 13 |
| 20 | 1977 | 32–18 | 64.0% | — | 2,074 | 0 | 19 | 1990 | 49–14 | 77.8% | #5 | 2,231 | 1 | 15 |
| 21 | 1978 | 28–13 | 68.3% | — | 2,049 | 0 | 21 | 1991 | 62–11 | 84.9% | #3 | 2,269 | 1 | 20 |
| 22 | 1979 | 57–27 | 67.9% | — | 2,005 | 0 | 22 | 1992 | 65–12 | 84.4% | #3 | 2,291 | 1 | 25 |
| 23 | 1980 | 46–21 | 68.7% | — | 2,009 | 0 | 22 | 1993 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #5 | 2,108 | 1 | 25 |
| 24 | 1981 | 13–19 | 40.6% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 22 | 1994 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #7 | 2,055 | 1 | 26 |
| 25 | 1982 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,786 | 0 | 22 | 1995 | 41–16 | 71.9% | #7 | 2,062 | 1 | 27 |
| 26 | 1983 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 22 | 1996 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #56 | 1,947 | 1 | 27 |
| 27 | 1984 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,717 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1985 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,794 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1986 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #25 | 1,818 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1987 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #21 | 1,850 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1988 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #56 | 1,749 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1989 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #131 | 1,674 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #306 | 1,631 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |