H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Dianne Fromholtz vs Janine Tremelling H2H: 1-1

Dianne Fromholtz and Janine Tremelling are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Janine Tremelling won the 1985 Salt Lake City round of 16 6-2 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dianne Fromholtz
AUS Age 70 Left-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Janine Tremelling
AUS Age 59 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Janine Tremelling 6-2 7-6 Dianne Fromholtz Match data Sep 13, 1985* R16 Salt Lake City WTA 250 Hard
Dianne Fromholtz 6-2 3-6 6-3 Janine Tremelling Match data May 10, 1985* R16 Australian Indoor WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dianne Fromholtz — #5 34 2,184 466 283 62.2% 0 0 0 2 20 22
Janine Tremelling — #53 14 1,722 39 59 39.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dianne Fromholtz Janine Tremelling
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1971 0–1 0.0% — 1,487 0 0 1982 1–1 50.0% — 1,506 0 0
15 1972 7–7 50.0% — 1,545 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1973 57–13 81.4% — 1,910 0 12 — — — — — — —
17 1974 52–20 72.2% — 1,971 0 16 1985 8–15 34.8% — 1,575 0 0
18 1975 34–29 54.0% — 1,904 0 16 1986 13–18 41.9% #67 1,601 0 1
19 1976 39–13 75.0% #5 2,085 0 19 1987 6–7 46.2% #106 1,622 0 1
20 1977 32–18 64.0% #8 2,083 0 19 1988 3–4 42.9% #182 1,607 0 1
21 1978 28–13 68.3% #10 2,079 0 21 1989 6–8 42.9% #116 1,614 0 1
22 1979 57–28 67.1% #6 2,016 0 22 1990 2–6 25.0% #214 1,591 0 1
23 1980 46–21 68.7% — 2,015 0 22 — — — — — — —
24 1981 13–19 40.6% — 1,740 0 22 — — — — — — —
25 1982 16–15 51.6% — 1,786 0 22 — — — — — — —
26 1983 7–13 35.0% — 1,691 0 22 — — — — — — —
27 1984 3–3 50.0% — 1,717 0 22 — — — — — — —
28 1985 17–17 50.0% — 1,794 0 22 — — — — — — —
29 1986 19–14 57.6% #25 1,836 0 22 — — — — — — —
30 1987 19–13 59.4% #21 1,863 0 22 — — — — — — —
31 1988 14–14 50.0% #56 1,754 0 22 — — — — — — —
32 1989 6–10 37.5% #131 1,677 0 22 — — — — — — —
33 1990 0–2 0.0% — 1,634 0 22 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dianne Fromholtz Janine Tremelling
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1971 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1982 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
15 1972 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 — — — — 26 2 28 92.9% 30 11 41 73.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1974 14 2 16 87.5% 13 7 20 65.0% 19 9 28 67.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1985 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0%
18 1975 8 8 16 50.0% 22 12 34 64.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1986 10 7 17 58.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
19 1976 5 2 7 71.4% 10 1 11 90.9% 14 5 19 73.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
20 1977 8 5 13 61.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 10 5 15 66.7% 10 6 16 62.5% 1988 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1978 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 17 3 20 85.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1989 0 3 3 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 1979 13 10 23 56.5% 8 3 11 72.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 29 11 40 72.5% 1990 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
23 1980 9 4 13 69.2% 4 1 5 80.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 27 14 41 65.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1982 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1983 0 3 3 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1984 — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1985 8 6 14 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1986 9 6 15 60.0% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 6 3 9 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1988 9 10 19 47.4% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1989 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1990 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 104 81 185 56.2% 109 50 159 68.6% 142 76 218 65.1% 103 74 177 58.2% — 15 18 33 45.5% 11 15 26 42.3% 12 17 29 41.4% 1 8 9 11.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dianne Fromholtz Janine Tremelling
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1971 1488 95.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.21 1982 1506 102.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 1–0 — +0.39
15 1972 1546 117.1 — — — — — +12 +28 53.3% 0.00 0–2 3–1 (75%) — +0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 1910 143.9 — — — — — +42 -25 74.7% +1.75 13–3 (81%) 5–2 (71%) 111.9 +5.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1974 1972 156.1 — — — — -98 -39 -12 69.8% +1.51 10–7 (59%) 8–4 (67%) 105.3 -4.03 1985 1576 132.8 — — — — +42 — +26 39.2% -0.65 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 96.8 -0.46
18 1975 1904 154.9 — — — — -40 +48 -25 53.8% +0.55 8–6 (57%) 2–8 (20%) 95.3 -9.51 1986 1602 125.2 — — — — +33 -31 -50 45.1% -0.61 3–6 (33%) 6–3 (67%) 101.1 -0.25
19 1976 2085 162.7 — — — — -18 -56 -78 70.3% +1.52 9–7 (56%) 2–3 (40%) 101.2 -5.29 1987 1623 116.9 — — — — — -61 -15 41.4% -0.83 3–0 (100%) 0–1 — -0.21
20 1977 2083 161.6 — — — — +1 -67 -19 61.5% +0.94 8–7 (53%) 6–4 (60%) 100.3 -4.49 1988 1607 109.6 — — — — -24 — -7 47.4% -0.53 2–3 (40%) — — +0.39
21 1978 2080 150.6 — — — — -65 — +71 65.6% +0.99 9–3 (75%) 4–3 (57%) 103.7 -3.63 1989 1614 117.3 — — — — -74 +43 -27 44.4% -0.26 3–0 (100%) 0–2 — -0.02
22 1979 2016 168.3 — — — — +50 +21 +53 66.3% +1.40 8–12 (40%) 9–7 (56%) 96.6 -3.31 1990 1591 112.1 — — — — — +36 — 30.0% -1.60 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — -0.65
23 1980 2015 158.3 — — — — +38 +67 +55 69.3% +1.36 5–7 (42%) 4–2 (67%) 98.3 -3.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1981 1740 124.8 — — — — +183 +184 +193 42.6% -0.43 1–5 (17%) 3–2 (60%) 91.7 +0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1982 1787 139.0 — — — — +85 +108 +114 48.5% -0.40 5–3 (63%) 4–0 (100%) 103.3 -1.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1983 1691 131.0 — — — — +58 +169 — 42.6% -0.34 1–6 (14%) 1–5 (17%) 88.7 -0.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1984 1718 126.0 — — — — — — +184 50.0% +0.36 1–1 0–2 — -0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1985 1794 143.9 — — — — -40 — +133 47.2% +0.17 4–4 (50%) 0–3 (0%) — -2.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1986 1837 143.3 — — — — -10 — +86 55.6% +0.28 6–2 (75%) 4–6 (40%) 103.1 -2.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 1863 138.0 — — — — -28 -92 +94 56.7% +0.54 5–0 (100%) 2–2 (50%) 105.7 -0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1988 1754 120.9 — — — — -21 — +153 49.3% -0.09 6–5 (55%) 1–3 (25%) 96.5 +1.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1989 1677 121.0 — — — — -25 — +183 43.6% -0.41 2–5 (29%) — — -0.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1990 1634 101.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–2 0–1 — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2184 157.2 — — — — +7 +45 +35 60.7% +0.84 101–87 (54%) 58–58 (50%) 98.6 -4.59 — 1722 128.3 — — — — +23 -1 -6 42.1% -0.68 14–15 (48%) 10–9 (53%) 104.0 -0.83

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.