H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Dianne Fromholtz vs Kate Gompert H2H: 0-1
Kate Gompert holds a 1–0 lead over Dianne Fromholtz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kate Gompert leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kate Gompert won the 1986 Tampa third round 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 69
Left-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 63
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 1986* | Tampa | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Kate Gompert | 6-2 6-0 | Dianne Fromholtz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dianne Fromholtz | #306 | #19 | 34 | 2,167 | 466 | 282 | 62.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 21 | 22 |
| Kate Gompert | #316 | #18 | 34 | 1,870 | 85 | 81 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dianne Fromholtz | Kate Gompert | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1972 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1973 | 57–13 | 81.4% | — | 1,911 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1974 | 52–20 | 72.2% | — | 1,963 | 0 | 16 | 1980 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1975 | 34–29 | 54.0% | — | 1,906 | 0 | 16 | 1981 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1976 | 39–13 | 75.0% | — | 2,063 | 0 | 19 | 1982 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1977 | 32–18 | 64.0% | — | 2,074 | 0 | 19 | 1983 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1978 | 28–13 | 68.3% | — | 2,049 | 0 | 21 | 1984 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #98 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1979 | 57–27 | 67.9% | — | 2,005 | 0 | 22 | 1985 | 11–8 | 57.9% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1980 | 46–21 | 68.7% | — | 2,009 | 0 | 22 | 1986 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #35 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1981 | 13–19 | 40.6% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 22 | 1987 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #22 | 1,829 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1982 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,786 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1983 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 22 | 1989 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #175 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1984 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,717 | 0 | 22 | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #301 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1985 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,794 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1986 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #25 | 1,818 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1987 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #21 | 1,850 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1988 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #56 | 1,749 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1989 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #131 | 1,674 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #306 | 1,631 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |