H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Dianne Fromholtz vs Kate Latham H2H: 3-4

Kate Latham holds a 4–3 lead over Dianne Fromholtz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on carpet, while Kate Latham leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Kate Latham won the 1982 Seattle third round 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dianne Fromholtz
AUS Age 69 Left-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
3 – 4
7 main draw meetings
Kate Latham
Age 73

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 21, 1982* Seattle WTA 250 R32 Carpet Kate Latham 6-2 6-3 Dianne Fromholtz Match data
Oct 14, 1979* Phoenix WTA 250 R16 Hard Kate Latham 6-3 6-3 Dianne Fromholtz Match data
Aug 17, 1979* Richmond WTA 250 R16 Carpet Kate Latham 4-6 6-4 6-2 Dianne Fromholtz Match data
Mar 15, 1979* Boston WTA 250 R32 Carpet Dianne Fromholtz 6-1 6-2 Kate Latham Match data
Feb 21, 1975* Detroit WTA 250 R32 Carpet Dianne Fromholtz 6-4 6-2 Kate Latham Match data
Oct 4, 1974* Houston WTA 250 R16 Hard Kate Latham 6-4 6-2 Dianne Fromholtz Match data
Apr 14, 1974* Phoenix Aztec WTA 250 F Hard Dianne Fromholtz 6-3 6-0 Kate Latham Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Dianne Fromholtz #306 #19 34 2,167 466 282 62.3% 0 0 0 1 21 22
Kate Latham — — — 1,866 198 202 49.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dianne Fromholtz Kate Latham
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1971 0–1 0.0% — 1,487 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1972 7–7 50.0% — 1,546 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1973 57–13 81.4% — 1,911 0 12 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
17 1974 52–20 72.2% — 1,963 0 16 1970 1–3 25.0% — 1,476 0 0
18 1975 34–29 54.0% — 1,906 0 16 — — — — — — —
19 1976 39–13 75.0% — 2,063 0 19 1972 3–3 50.0% — 1,503 0 0
20 1977 32–18 64.0% — 2,074 0 19 1973 6–7 46.2% — 1,587 0 0
21 1978 28–13 68.3% — 2,049 0 21 1974 40–16 71.4% — 1,844 0 3
22 1979 57–27 67.9% — 2,005 0 22 1975 15–20 42.9% — 1,690 0 3
23 1980 46–21 68.7% — 2,009 0 22 1976 4–2 66.7% — 1,680 0 3
24 1981 13–19 40.6% — 1,740 0 22 1977 15–12 55.6% — 1,755 0 3
25 1982 16–15 51.6% — 1,786 0 22 1978 13–17 43.3% — 1,661 0 3
26 1983 7–13 35.0% — 1,691 0 22 1979 21–23 47.7% — 1,848 0 3
27 1984 3–3 50.0% #138 1,717 0 22 1980 23–22 51.1% — 1,750 0 4
28 1985 17–17 50.0% #97 1,794 0 22 1981 21–20 51.2% — 1,774 0 5
29 1986 19–14 57.6% #25 1,818 0 22 1982 24–28 46.2% — 1,688 0 5
30 1987 19–13 59.4% #21 1,850 0 22 1983 9–16 36.0% — 1,625 0 6
31 1988 14–14 50.0% #56 1,749 0 22 1984 0–11 0.0% — 1,494 0 6
32 1989 6–10 37.5% #131 1,674 0 22 1985 3–1 75.0% — 1,528 0 6
33 1990 0–2 0.0% #306 1,631 0 22 — — — — — — —