H2H data updated: 2026-10-30 00:00 UTC

Dianne Fromholtz vs Kathy Jordan H2H: 1-1

Dianne Fromholtz and Kathy Jordan are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kathy Jordan leads 1–0 on carpet, while Dianne Fromholtz leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kathy Jordan won the 1985 Chicago round of 32 7-5 6-2.

AUS Age 70 Left-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
USA Age 66 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kathy Jordan 7-5 6-2 Dianne Fromholtz Match data Sep 19, 1985* R32 Chicago WTA 250 Carpet
Dianne Fromholtz 3-6 6-0 6-2 Kathy Jordan Match data May 11, 1985* QF Australian Indoor WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dianne Fromholtz — #5 34 2,184 466 283 62.2% 0 0 0 2 20 22
Kathy Jordan — #5 44 2,094 249 155 61.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dianne Fromholtz Kathy Jordan
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1971 0–1 0.0% — 1,487 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1972 7–7 50.0% — 1,545 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1973 57–13 81.4% — 1,910 0 12 — — — — — — —
17 1974 52–20 72.2% — 1,971 0 16 — — — — — — —
18 1975 34–29 54.0% — 1,904 0 16 1978 4–3 57.1% — 1,560 0 0
19 1976 39–13 75.0% #5 2,085 0 19 1979 25–13 65.8% — 1,895 0 1
20 1977 32–18 64.0% #8 2,083 0 19 1980 37–21 63.8% — 2,003 0 1
21 1978 28–13 68.3% #10 2,079 0 21 1981 28–20 58.3% — 1,923 0 1
22 1979 57–28 67.1% #6 2,016 0 22 1982 21–18 53.8% — 1,886 0 2
23 1980 46–21 68.7% — 2,015 0 22 1983 44–22 66.7% — 2,010 0 2
24 1981 13–19 40.6% — 1,740 0 22 1984 23–11 67.6% #10 2,024 0 2
25 1982 16–15 51.6% — 1,786 0 22 1985 28–15 65.1% — 1,979 0 2
26 1983 7–13 35.0% — 1,691 0 22 1986 25–15 62.5% #15 1,910 0 2
27 1984 3–3 50.0% — 1,717 0 22 1987 12–10 54.5% #35 1,892 0 2
28 1985 17–17 50.0% — 1,794 0 22 — — — — — — —
29 1986 19–14 57.6% #25 1,836 0 22 1989 0–1 0.0% — 1,874 0 2
30 1987 19–13 59.4% #21 1,863 0 22 1990 2–6 25.0% #207 1,791 0 2
31 1988 14–14 50.0% #56 1,754 0 22 — — — — — — —
32 1989 6–10 37.5% #131 1,677 0 22 — — — — — — —
33 1990 0–2 0.0% — 1,634 0 22 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dianne Fromholtz Kathy Jordan
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1971 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1972 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 — — — — 26 2 28 92.9% 30 11 41 73.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1974 14 2 16 87.5% 13 7 20 65.0% 19 9 28 67.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1975 8 8 16 50.0% 22 12 34 64.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
19 1976 5 2 7 71.4% 10 1 11 90.9% 14 5 19 73.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 1979 12 5 17 70.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3%
20 1977 8 5 13 61.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 10 5 15 66.7% 10 6 16 62.5% 1980 10 4 14 71.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 19 12 31 61.3%
21 1978 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 17 3 20 85.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1981 6 3 9 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 11 9 20 55.0%
22 1979 13 10 23 56.5% 8 3 11 72.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 29 11 40 72.5% 1982 6 4 10 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 9 18 50.0%
23 1980 9 4 13 69.2% 4 1 5 80.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 27 14 41 65.9% 1983 15 5 20 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 14 6 20 70.0% 10 8 18 55.6%
24 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1984 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 7 3 10 70.0%
25 1982 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1985 12 6 18 66.7% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 11 5 16 68.8%
26 1983 0 3 3 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1986 13 6 19 68.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
27 1984 — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1987 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
28 1985 8 6 14 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1986 9 6 15 60.0% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 6 3 9 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1990 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 1988 9 10 19 47.4% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1989 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1990 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 104 81 185 56.2% 109 50 159 68.6% 142 76 218 65.1% 103 74 177 58.2% — 85 46 131 64.9% 20 18 38 52.6% 57 32 89 64.0% 87 59 146 59.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dianne Fromholtz Kathy Jordan
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1971 1488 95.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1972 1546 117.1 — — — — — +12 +28 53.3% 0.00 0–2 3–1 (75%) — +0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 1910 143.9 — — — — — +42 -25 74.7% +1.75 13–3 (81%) 5–2 (71%) 111.9 +5.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1974 1972 156.1 — — — — -98 -39 -12 69.8% +1.51 10–7 (59%) 8–4 (67%) 105.3 -4.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1975 1904 154.9 — — — — -40 +48 -25 53.8% +0.55 8–6 (57%) 2–8 (20%) 95.3 -9.51 1978 1560 118.9 — — — — — — +41 58.8% +0.71 1–2 (33%) — — +0.06
19 1976 2085 162.7 — — — — -18 -56 -78 70.3% +1.52 9–7 (56%) 2–3 (40%) 101.2 -5.29 1979 1895 156.2 — — — — +33 — -202 61.0% +1.00 5–3 (63%) 1–4 (20%) 104.2 +0.09
20 1977 2083 161.6 — — — — +1 -67 -19 61.5% +0.94 8–7 (53%) 6–4 (60%) 100.3 -4.49 1980 2003 164.4 — — — — +39 -361 -262 63.3% +0.95 5–7 (42%) 5–1 (83%) 102.2 -5.85
21 1978 2080 150.6 — — — — -65 — +71 65.6% +0.99 9–3 (75%) 4–3 (57%) 103.7 -3.63 1981 1923 148.5 — — — — +52 -259 -74 60.0% +0.90 8–7 (53%) 3–8 (27%) 97.2 +0.92
22 1979 2016 168.3 — — — — +50 +21 +53 66.3% +1.40 8–12 (40%) 9–7 (56%) 96.6 -3.31 1982 1886 146.5 — — — — +57 -207 -61 53.2% +0.03 8–8 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 99.2 -3.98
23 1980 2015 158.3 — — — — +38 +67 +55 69.3% +1.36 5–7 (42%) 4–2 (67%) 98.3 -3.29 1983 2011 155.7 — — — — -21 -248 -32 62.3% +1.00 14–8 (64%) 8–6 (57%) 103.8 -2.22
24 1981 1740 124.8 — — — — +183 +184 +193 42.6% -0.43 1–5 (17%) 3–2 (60%) 91.7 +0.43 1984 2025 159.8 — — — — -49 -277 +115 65.3% +1.16 4–3 (57%) 2–3 (40%) 99.9 -2.58
25 1982 1787 139.0 — — — — +85 +108 +114 48.5% -0.40 5–3 (63%) 4–0 (100%) 103.3 -1.68 1985 1980 155.5 — — — — +58 — +37 59.8% +1.02 13–5 (72%) 3–1 (75%) 104.9 -2.86
26 1983 1691 131.0 — — — — +58 +169 — 42.6% -0.34 1–6 (14%) 1–5 (17%) 88.7 -0.67 1986 1911 153.4 — — — — +59 — +131 62.2% +1.00 4–6 (40%) 6–3 (67%) 96.2 -1.55
27 1984 1718 126.0 — — — — — — +184 50.0% +0.36 1–1 0–2 — -0.61 1987 1893 137.3 — — — — +45 — +97 56.3% +0.46 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 99.1 -1.56
28 1985 1794 143.9 — — — — -40 — +133 47.2% +0.17 4–4 (50%) 0–3 (0%) — -2.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1986 1837 143.3 — — — — -10 — +86 55.6% +0.28 6–2 (75%) 4–6 (40%) 103.1 -2.36 1989 1875 106.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — -0.26
30 1987 1863 138.0 — — — — -28 -92 +94 56.7% +0.54 5–0 (100%) 2–2 (50%) 105.7 -0.46 1990 1792 109.8 — — — — +35 — +143 30.0% -1.60 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -1.37
31 1988 1754 120.9 — — — — -21 — +153 49.3% -0.09 6–5 (55%) 1–3 (25%) 96.5 +1.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1989 1677 121.0 — — — — -25 — +183 43.6% -0.41 2–5 (29%) — — -0.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1990 1634 101.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–2 0–1 — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2184 157.2 — — — — +7 +45 +35 60.7% +0.84 101–87 (54%) 58–58 (50%) 98.6 -4.59 — 2095 160.7 — — — — +33 -276 -9 59.9% +0.80 67–55 (55%) 35–31 (53%) 101.2 -5.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.