H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Dianne Fromholtz vs Larisa Savchenko H2H: 0-1
Larisa Savchenko holds a 1–0 lead over Dianne Fromholtz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Larisa Savchenko leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Larisa Savchenko won the 1985 Brisbane second round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 69
Left-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
URS
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 1985* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R64 | Grass | Larisa Savchenko | 7-5 6-3 | Dianne Fromholtz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dianne Fromholtz | #306 | #19 | 34 | 2,167 | 466 | 282 | 62.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 21 | 22 |
| Larisa Savchenko | #305 | #13 | 454 | 1,926 | 238 | 239 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Dianne Fromholtz | Larisa Savchenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1972 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 57–13 | 81.4% | — | 1,911 | 0 | 12 | 1985 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #55 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 52–20 | 72.2% | — | 1,963 | 0 | 16 | 1986 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #36 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 |
| 1975 | 34–29 | 54.0% | — | 1,906 | 0 | 16 | 1987 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 |
| 1976 | 39–13 | 75.0% | — | 2,063 | 0 | 19 | 1988 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #16 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 |
| 1977 | 32–18 | 64.0% | — | 2,074 | 0 | 19 | 1989 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,887 | 0 | 0 |
| 1978 | 28–13 | 68.3% | — | 2,049 | 0 | 21 | 1990 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #91 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 57–27 | 67.9% | — | 2,005 | 0 | 22 | 1991 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #48 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 1980 | 46–21 | 68.7% | — | 2,009 | 0 | 22 | 1992 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 1981 | 13–19 | 40.6% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 22 | 1993 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 1982 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,786 | 0 | 22 | 1994 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #41 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 |
| 1983 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 22 | 1995 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #99 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 1984 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,717 | 0 | 22 | 1996 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #61 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| 1985 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,794 | 0 | 22 | 1997 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #87 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 1986 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #25 | 1,818 | 0 | 22 | 1998 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #73 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 1987 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #21 | 1,850 | 0 | 22 | 1999 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #210 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 |
| 1988 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #56 | 1,749 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #131 | 1,674 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #306 | 1,631 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |