H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Dianne Fromholtz vs Michelle Tyler H2H: 3-0

Dianne Fromholtz holds a 3–0 lead over Michelle Tyler in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Dianne Fromholtz leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Dianne Fromholtz won the 1978 Sydney round of 16 6-3 6-1.

AUS Age 70 Left-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dianne Fromholtz 6-3 6-1 Michelle Tyler Match data Dec 8, 1978* R16 Sydney WTA 500 Grass
Dianne Fromholtz 6-4 3-6 6-3 Michelle Tyler Match data Jan 5, 1978* R32 Washington Open WTA 500 Carpet
Dianne Fromholtz 6-2 6-3 Michelle Tyler Match data Sep 6, 1977* R32 US Open Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dianne Fromholtz — #5 34 2,184 466 283 62.2% 0 0 0 2 20 22
Michelle Tyler — — — 1,889 93 80 53.8% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dianne Fromholtz Michelle Tyler
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,485 0 0
14 1971 0–1 0.0% — 1,487 0 0 1973 0–1 0.0% — 1,468 0 0
15 1972 7–7 50.0% — 1,545 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1973 57–13 81.4% — 1,910 0 12 1975 23–16 59.0% — 1,686 0 0
17 1974 52–20 72.2% — 1,971 0 16 1976 27–13 67.5% — 1,757 0 4
18 1975 34–29 54.0% — 1,904 0 16 1977 13–10 56.5% — 1,799 0 4
19 1976 39–13 75.0% #5 2,085 0 19 1978 20–23 46.5% — 1,776 0 4
20 1977 32–18 64.0% #8 2,083 0 19 1979 5–10 33.3% — 1,663 0 4
21 1978 28–13 68.3% #10 2,079 0 21 1980 1–3 25.0% — 1,603 0 4
22 1979 57–28 67.1% #6 2,016 0 22 — — — — — — —
23 1980 46–21 68.7% — 2,015 0 22 1982 4–2 66.7% — 1,613 0 5
24 1981 13–19 40.6% — 1,740 0 22 1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,593 0 5
25 1982 16–15 51.6% — 1,786 0 22 — — — — — — —
26 1983 7–13 35.0% — 1,691 0 22 — — — — — — —
27 1984 3–3 50.0% — 1,717 0 22 — — — — — — —
28 1985 17–17 50.0% — 1,794 0 22 — — — — — — —
29 1986 19–14 57.6% #25 1,836 0 22 — — — — — — —
30 1987 19–13 59.4% #21 1,863 0 22 — — — — — — —
31 1988 14–14 50.0% #56 1,754 0 22 — — — — — — —
32 1989 6–10 37.5% #131 1,677 0 22 — — — — — — —
33 1990 0–2 0.0% — 1,634 0 22 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dianne Fromholtz Michelle Tyler
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
14 1971 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1973 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
15 1972 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 — — — — 26 2 28 92.9% 30 11 41 73.2% — — — — 1975 — — — — 10 7 17 58.8% 12 7 19 63.2% — — — —
17 1974 14 2 16 87.5% 13 7 20 65.0% 19 9 28 67.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1976 — — — — 14 5 19 73.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 12 4 16 75.0%
18 1975 8 8 16 50.0% 22 12 34 64.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1976 5 2 7 71.4% 10 1 11 90.9% 14 5 19 73.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 1978 5 7 12 41.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 9 13 30.8%
20 1977 8 5 13 61.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 10 5 15 66.7% 10 6 16 62.5% 1979 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 1978 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 17 3 20 85.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1980 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1979 13 10 23 56.5% 8 3 11 72.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 29 11 40 72.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1980 9 4 13 69.2% 4 1 5 80.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 27 14 41 65.9% 1982 — — — — 3 0 3 100.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1983 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 1982 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1983 0 3 3 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1984 — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1985 8 6 14 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1986 9 6 15 60.0% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 6 3 9 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1988 9 10 19 47.4% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1989 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1990 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 104 81 185 56.2% 109 50 159 68.6% 142 76 218 65.1% 103 74 177 58.2% — 6 9 15 40.0% 38 24 62 61.3% 31 26 57 54.4% 17 17 34 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dianne Fromholtz Michelle Tyler
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1486 93.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.04
14 1971 1488 95.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.21 1973 1469 97.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.11
15 1972 1546 117.1 — — — — — +12 +28 53.3% 0.00 0–2 3–1 (75%) — +0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 1910 143.9 — — — — — +42 -25 74.7% +1.75 13–3 (81%) 5–2 (71%) 111.9 +5.47 1975 1686 127.6 — — — — — -55 -16 57.6% +0.67 7–7 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 100.2 +1.99
17 1974 1972 156.1 — — — — -98 -39 -12 69.8% +1.51 10–7 (59%) 8–4 (67%) 105.3 -4.03 1976 1757 133.3 — — — — -3 +2 -108 65.1% +1.44 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 102.6 +7.82
18 1975 1904 154.9 — — — — -40 +48 -25 53.8% +0.55 8–6 (57%) 2–8 (20%) 95.3 -9.51 1977 1800 134.0 — — — — -52 -2 -93 56.3% +0.50 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — -0.65
19 1976 2085 162.7 — — — — -18 -56 -78 70.3% +1.52 9–7 (56%) 2–3 (40%) 101.2 -5.29 1978 1776 140.8 — — — — -93 +40 +16 46.7% -0.39 7–5 (58%) 3–1 (75%) 105.2 -4.48
20 1977 2083 161.6 — — — — +1 -67 -19 61.5% +0.94 8–7 (53%) 6–4 (60%) 100.3 -4.49 1979 1664 101.6 — — — — — +121 +51 31.3% -1.75 2–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.80
21 1978 2080 150.6 — — — — -65 — +71 65.6% +0.99 9–3 (75%) 4–3 (57%) 103.7 -3.63 1980 1603 96.1 — — — — — +123 — 25.0% -1.25 — 1–1 — +0.50
22 1979 2016 168.3 — — — — +50 +21 +53 66.3% +1.40 8–12 (40%) 9–7 (56%) 96.6 -3.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1980 2015 158.3 — — — — +38 +67 +55 69.3% +1.36 5–7 (42%) 4–2 (67%) 98.3 -3.29 1982 1614 102.2 — — — — — +161 — 61.5% +0.54 1–0 — — +1.03
24 1981 1740 124.8 — — — — +183 +184 +193 42.6% -0.43 1–5 (17%) 3–2 (60%) 91.7 +0.43 1983 1594 97.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.19
25 1982 1787 139.0 — — — — +85 +108 +114 48.5% -0.40 5–3 (63%) 4–0 (100%) 103.3 -1.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1983 1691 131.0 — — — — +58 +169 — 42.6% -0.34 1–6 (14%) 1–5 (17%) 88.7 -0.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1984 1718 126.0 — — — — — — +184 50.0% +0.36 1–1 0–2 — -0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1985 1794 143.9 — — — — -40 — +133 47.2% +0.17 4–4 (50%) 0–3 (0%) — -2.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1986 1837 143.3 — — — — -10 — +86 55.6% +0.28 6–2 (75%) 4–6 (40%) 103.1 -2.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 1863 138.0 — — — — -28 -92 +94 56.7% +0.54 5–0 (100%) 2–2 (50%) 105.7 -0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1988 1754 120.9 — — — — -21 — +153 49.3% -0.09 6–5 (55%) 1–3 (25%) 96.5 +1.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1989 1677 121.0 — — — — -25 — +183 43.6% -0.41 2–5 (29%) — — -0.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1990 1634 101.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–2 0–1 — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2184 157.2 — — — — +7 +45 +35 60.7% +0.84 101–87 (54%) 58–58 (50%) 98.6 -4.59 — 1889 132.2 — — — — -57 +13 -22 52.9% +0.25 24–18 (57%) 13–11 (54%) 105.9 +4.30

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.