H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Dianne Fromholtz vs Nancy Richey H2H: 0-1
Nancy Richey holds a 1–0 lead over Dianne Fromholtz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nancy Richey leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nancy Richey won the 1975 Akron third round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 69
Left-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 83
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 1975* | Akron | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Nancy Richey | 7-5 6-2 | Dianne Fromholtz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dianne Fromholtz | #306 | #19 | 34 | 2,167 | 466 | 282 | 62.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 21 | 22 |
| Nancy Richey | — | — | — | 2,236 | 324 | 109 | 74.8% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 24 | 28 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dianne Fromholtz | Nancy Richey | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1972 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1973 | 57–13 | 81.4% | — | 1,911 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1974 | 52–20 | 72.2% | — | 1,963 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1975 | 34–29 | 54.0% | — | 1,906 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1976 | 39–13 | 75.0% | — | 2,063 | 0 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1977 | 32–18 | 64.0% | — | 2,074 | 0 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1978 | 28–13 | 68.3% | — | 2,049 | 0 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1979 | 57–27 | 67.9% | — | 2,005 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1980 | 46–21 | 68.7% | — | 2,009 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1981 | 13–19 | 40.6% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1982 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,786 | 0 | 22 | 1968 | 56–5 | 91.8% | — | 1,887 | 1 | 10 |
| 26 | 1983 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 22 | 1969 | 33–8 | 80.5% | — | 2,031 | 1 | 13 |
| 27 | 1984 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,717 | 0 | 22 | 1970 | 43–8 | 84.3% | — | 2,114 | 1 | 20 |
| 28 | 1985 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,794 | 0 | 22 | 1971 | 29–13 | 69.0% | — | 2,078 | 1 | 20 |
| 29 | 1986 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #25 | 1,818 | 0 | 22 | 1972 | 45–12 | 78.9% | — | 2,128 | 1 | 25 |
| 30 | 1987 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #21 | 1,850 | 0 | 22 | 1973 | 34–13 | 72.3% | — | 2,162 | 1 | 25 |
| 31 | 1988 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #56 | 1,749 | 0 | 22 | 1974 | 25–13 | 65.8% | — | 2,057 | 1 | 25 |
| 32 | 1989 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #131 | 1,674 | 0 | 22 | 1975 | 24–11 | 68.6% | — | 2,080 | 1 | 26 |
| 33 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #306 | 1,631 | 0 | 22 | 1976 | 14–10 | 58.3% | — | 2,034 | 1 | 26 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 15–7 | 68.2% | — | 1,983 | 1 | 28 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,902 | 1 | 28 |