H2H data updated: 2026-10-30 00:00 UTC

Dianne Fromholtz vs Raffaella Reggi Concato H2H: 1-0

Dianne Fromholtz holds a 1–0 lead over Raffaella Reggi Concato in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dianne Fromholtz leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Dianne Fromholtz won the 1987 Dallas round of 32 2-6 6-0 6-4.

AUS Age 70 Left-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
ITA Age 60 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dianne Fromholtz #26 2-6 6-0 6-4 Raffaella Reggi Concato Match data Mar 19, 1987* R32 Dallas WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dianne Fromholtz — #5 34 2,184 466 283 62.2% 0 0 0 2 20 22
Raffaella Reggi Concato — — — 1,930 260 178 59.4% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dianne Fromholtz Raffaella Reggi Concato
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1971 0–1 0.0% — 1,487 0 0 1980 1–1 50.0% — 1,484 0 0
15 1972 7–7 50.0% — 1,545 0 0 1981 0–5 0.0% — 1,421 0 0
16 1973 57–13 81.4% — 1,910 0 12 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,414 0 0
17 1974 52–20 72.2% — 1,971 0 16 1983 21–20 51.2% — 1,668 0 0
18 1975 34–29 54.0% — 1,904 0 16 1984 17–14 54.8% — 1,753 0 0
19 1976 39–13 75.0% #5 2,085 0 19 1985 26–19 57.8% — 1,783 0 1
20 1977 32–18 64.0% #8 2,083 0 19 1986 31–20 60.8% — 1,896 0 3
21 1978 28–13 68.3% #10 2,079 0 21 1987 39–21 65.0% — 1,904 0 4
22 1979 57–28 67.1% #6 2,016 0 22 1988 30–16 65.2% — 1,911 0 4
23 1980 46–21 68.7% — 2,015 0 22 1989 39–22 63.9% — 1,856 0 4
24 1981 13–19 40.6% — 1,740 0 22 1990 31–16 66.0% — 1,816 0 5
25 1982 16–15 51.6% — 1,786 0 22 1991 11–11 50.0% — 1,707 0 5
26 1983 7–13 35.0% — 1,691 0 22 1992 14–12 53.8% — 1,723 0 5
27 1984 3–3 50.0% — 1,717 0 22 — — — — — — —
28 1985 17–17 50.0% — 1,794 0 22 — — — — — — —
29 1986 19–14 57.6% #25 1,836 0 22 — — — — — — —
30 1987 19–13 59.4% #21 1,863 0 22 — — — — — — —
31 1988 14–14 50.0% #56 1,754 0 22 — — — — — — —
32 1989 6–10 37.5% #131 1,677 0 22 — — — — — — —
33 1990 0–2 0.0% — 1,634 0 22 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dianne Fromholtz Raffaella Reggi Concato
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1971 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1980 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
15 1972 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 1981 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1973 — — — — 26 2 28 92.9% 30 11 41 73.2% — — — — 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1974 14 2 16 87.5% 13 7 20 65.0% 19 9 28 67.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1983 6 4 10 60.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0%
18 1975 8 8 16 50.0% 22 12 34 64.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 14 7 21 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
19 1976 5 2 7 71.4% 10 1 11 90.9% 14 5 19 73.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 1985 4 7 11 36.4% 20 8 28 71.4% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3%
20 1977 8 5 13 61.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 10 5 15 66.7% 10 6 16 62.5% 1986 13 7 20 65.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 8 15 46.7%
21 1978 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 17 3 20 85.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1987 11 5 16 68.8% 20 10 30 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0%
22 1979 13 10 23 56.5% 8 3 11 72.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 29 11 40 72.5% 1988 11 6 17 64.7% 12 7 19 63.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4%
23 1980 9 4 13 69.2% 4 1 5 80.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 27 14 41 65.9% 1989 20 11 31 64.5% 6 4 10 60.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 5 11 54.5%
24 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1990 22 12 34 64.7% 8 2 10 80.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 1982 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0%
26 1983 0 3 3 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1992 10 7 17 58.8% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
27 1984 — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1985 8 6 14 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1986 9 6 15 60.0% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 6 3 9 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1988 9 10 19 47.4% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1989 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1990 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 104 81 185 56.2% 109 50 159 68.6% 142 76 218 65.1% 103 74 177 58.2% — 101 67 168 60.1% 102 57 159 64.2% 23 17 40 57.5% 34 34 68 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dianne Fromholtz Raffaella Reggi Concato
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1971 1488 95.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.21 1980 1485 95.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.12
15 1972 1546 117.1 — — — — — +12 +28 53.3% 0.00 0–2 3–1 (75%) — +0.81 1981 1421 91.5 — — — — — — — 23.1% -2.39 0–3 (0%) — — +0.24
16 1973 1910 143.9 — — — — — +42 -25 74.7% +1.75 13–3 (81%) 5–2 (71%) 111.9 +5.47 1982 1414 94.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.03
17 1974 1972 156.1 — — — — -98 -39 -12 69.8% +1.51 10–7 (59%) 8–4 (67%) 105.3 -4.03 1983 1669 126.1 — — — — +20 -51 -56 47.3% -0.21 9–2 (82%) 3–4 (43%) 109.6 0.00
18 1975 1904 154.9 — — — — -40 +48 -25 53.8% +0.55 8–6 (57%) 2–8 (20%) 95.3 -9.51 1984 1754 129.5 — — — — -113 +30 -124 55.2% 0.00 2–3 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 103.3 -0.99
19 1976 2085 162.7 — — — — -18 -56 -78 70.3% +1.52 9–7 (56%) 2–3 (40%) 101.2 -5.29 1985 1784 138.5 — — — — -146 +128 — 54.2% +0.26 11–6 (65%) 4–5 (44%) 102.7 +0.43
20 1977 2083 161.6 — — — — +1 -67 -19 61.5% +0.94 8–7 (53%) 6–4 (60%) 100.3 -4.49 1986 1897 151.9 — — — — -62 +67 -239 57.6% +0.70 10–6 (63%) 5–2 (71%) 105.3 -1.96
21 1978 2080 150.6 — — — — -65 — +71 65.6% +0.99 9–3 (75%) 4–3 (57%) 103.7 -3.63 1987 1904 144.7 — — — — -18 +25 -206 62.5% +0.81 9–9 (50%) 5–0 (100%) 99.9 +0.52
22 1979 2016 168.3 — — — — +50 +21 +53 66.3% +1.40 8–12 (40%) 9–7 (56%) 96.6 -3.31 1988 1912 144.0 — — — — +15 -21 -182 61.0% +0.50 9–4 (69%) 6–2 (75%) 106.8 -1.34
23 1980 2015 158.3 — — — — +38 +67 +55 69.3% +1.36 5–7 (42%) 4–2 (67%) 98.3 -3.29 1989 1856 141.5 — — — — -4 +23 -72 59.4% +0.69 12–8 (60%) 8–2 (80%) 107.5 +0.39
24 1981 1740 124.8 — — — — +183 +184 +193 42.6% -0.43 1–5 (17%) 3–2 (60%) 91.7 +0.43 1990 1816 143.0 — — — — +36 +79 -27 61.5% +0.89 12–5 (71%) 4–5 (44%) 100.3 +0.44
25 1982 1787 139.0 — — — — +85 +108 +114 48.5% -0.40 5–3 (63%) 4–0 (100%) 103.3 -1.68 1991 1708 117.7 — — — — +34 +163 — 49.0% -0.35 4–3 (57%) 4–1 (80%) 101.6 +1.53
26 1983 1691 131.0 — — — — +58 +169 — 42.6% -0.34 1–6 (14%) 1–5 (17%) 88.7 -0.67 1992 1723 128.3 — — — — +7 +121 — 52.5% -0.02 4–3 (57%) 4–0 (100%) 103.2 -0.10
27 1984 1718 126.0 — — — — — — +184 50.0% +0.36 1–1 0–2 — -0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1985 1794 143.9 — — — — -40 — +133 47.2% +0.17 4–4 (50%) 0–3 (0%) — -2.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1986 1837 143.3 — — — — -10 — +86 55.6% +0.28 6–2 (75%) 4–6 (40%) 103.1 -2.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 1863 138.0 — — — — -28 -92 +94 56.7% +0.54 5–0 (100%) 2–2 (50%) 105.7 -0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1988 1754 120.9 — — — — -21 — +153 49.3% -0.09 6–5 (55%) 1–3 (25%) 96.5 +1.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1989 1677 121.0 — — — — -25 — +183 43.6% -0.41 2–5 (29%) — — -0.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1990 1634 101.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–2 0–1 — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2184 157.2 — — — — +7 +45 +35 60.7% +0.84 101–87 (54%) 58–58 (50%) 98.6 -4.59 — 1930 143.9 — — — — -14 +46 -117 56.4% +0.38 82–52 (61%) 47–22 (68%) 113.8 -0.17

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.