H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Dianne Fromholtz vs Renee Richards H2H: 3-0

Dianne Fromholtz holds a 3–0 lead over Renee Richards in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Dianne Fromholtz leads 3–0 on carpet. Most recently, Dianne Fromholtz won the 1980 Minneapolis quarterfinal 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dianne Fromholtz
AUS Age 70 Left-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Renee Richards
USA Age 92 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dianne Fromholtz 6-1 6-2 Renee Richards Match data Oct 4, 1980* QF Minneapolis WTA 250 Carpet
Dianne Fromholtz 6-3 6-4 Renee Richards Match data Feb 24, 1978* R16 Detroit WTA 250 Carpet
Dianne Fromholtz 6-1 6-3 Renee Richards Match data Oct 6, 1977* R32 Atlanta WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dianne Fromholtz #306 #5 34 2,181 466 282 62.3% 0 0 0 2 20 22
Renee Richards — — — 1,864 117 86 57.6% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dianne Fromholtz Renee Richards
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1971 0–1 0.0% — 1,487 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1972 7–7 50.0% — 1,545 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1973 57–13 81.4% — 1,910 0 12 — — — — — — —
17 1974 52–20 72.2% — 1,971 0 16 — — — — — — —
18 1975 34–29 54.0% — 1,903 0 16 — — — — — — —
19 1976 39–13 75.0% #5 2,069 0 19 — — — — — — —
20 1977 32–18 64.0% #8 2,077 0 19 — — — — — — —
21 1978 28–13 68.3% #10 2,076 0 21 — — — — — — —
22 1979 57–27 67.9% #6 2,015 0 22 — — — — — — —
23 1980 46–21 68.7% — 2,013 0 22 — — — — — — —
24 1981 13–19 40.6% — 1,739 0 22 — — — — — — —
25 1982 16–15 51.6% — 1,785 0 22 — — — — — — —
26 1983 7–13 35.0% — 1,690 0 22 — — — — — — —
27 1984 3–3 50.0% #138 1,717 0 22 — — — — — — —
28 1985 17–17 50.0% #97 1,793 0 22 — — — — — — —
29 1986 19–14 57.6% #25 1,836 0 22 — — — — — — —
30 1987 19–13 59.4% #21 1,863 0 22 — — — — — — —
31 1988 14–14 50.0% #56 1,754 0 22 — — — — — — —
32 1989 6–10 37.5% #131 1,676 0 22 — — — — — — —
33 1990 0–2 0.0% #306 1,633 0 22 — — — — — — —
41 — — — — — — — 1976 12–2 85.7% — 1,672 0 1
42 — — — — — — — 1977 24–10 70.6% — 1,833 0 2
43 — — — — — — — 1978 12–13 48.0% — 1,806 0 2
44 — — — — — — — 1979 17–24 41.5% — 1,832 0 2
45 — — — — — — — 1980 47–28 62.7% — 1,753 0 7
46 — — — — — — — 1981 5–8 38.5% — 1,697 0 8
47 — — — — — — — 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,671 0 8

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dianne Fromholtz Renee Richards
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1971 1488 95.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1972 1546 117.1 — — — — — +12 +28 53.3% 0.00 0–2 3–1 (75%) — +0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 1910 143.9 — — — — — +42 -25 74.7% +1.75 13–3 (81%) 5–2 (71%) 111.9 +5.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1974 1972 156.1 — — — — -99 -39 -12 69.8% +1.51 10–7 (59%) 8–4 (67%) 105.3 -4.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1975 1904 154.9 — — — — -41 +47 -26 53.8% +0.55 8–6 (57%) 2–8 (20%) 95.3 -8.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1976 2070 160.7 — — — — -35 -42 -62 70.3% +1.52 9–7 (56%) 2–3 (40%) 101.1 -4.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1977 2077 161.3 — — — — -7 -60 -13 61.5% +0.94 8–7 (53%) 6–4 (60%) 100.5 -4.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1978 2076 150.6 — — — — -68 — +76 65.6% +0.99 9–3 (75%) 4–3 (57%) 103.8 -3.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1979 2016 167.5 — — — — +50 +20 +54 66.9% +1.45 8–11 (42%) 9–7 (56%) 97.0 -2.87 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1980 2013 158.0 — — — — +36 +66 +56 69.3% +1.36 5–7 (42%) 4–2 (67%) 98.3 -2.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1981 1739 124.8 — — — — +183 +184 +193 42.6% -0.43 1–5 (17%) 3–2 (60%) 91.7 +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1982 1786 138.8 — — — — +84 +108 +114 48.5% -0.40 5–3 (63%) 4–0 (100%) 103.3 -1.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1983 1691 130.9 — — — — +57 +168 — 42.6% -0.34 1–6 (14%) 1–5 (17%) 88.7 -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1984 1717 126.0 — — — — — — +184 50.0% +0.36 1–1 0–2 — -0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1985 1794 143.8 — — — — -42 — +133 47.2% +0.17 4–4 (50%) 0–3 (0%) — -2.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1986 1836 143.2 — — — — -9 — +88 55.6% +0.28 6–2 (75%) 4–6 (40%) 103.1 -2.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 1863 138.0 — — — — -29 -91 +94 56.7% +0.54 5–0 (100%) 2–2 (50%) 105.7 -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1988 1754 120.9 — — — — -21 — +154 49.3% -0.09 6–5 (55%) 1–3 (25%) 96.5 +1.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1989 1677 120.9 — — — — -25 — +183 43.6% -0.41 2–5 (29%) — — -0.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1990 1634 101.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–2 0–1 — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1673 122.7 — — — — +101 -96 — 80.0% +2.03 2–2 (50%) 2–0 — +3.38
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1834 139.4 — — — — +5 -171 — 69.0% +1.55 2–3 (40%) 1–6 (14%) 94.7 +3.72
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1807 137.7 — — — — -59 -74 — 41.5% -0.23 5–4 (56%) 5–4 (56%) 102.0 -0.34
44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1833 155.6 — — — — -81 -15 — 45.4% -0.38 5–10 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 96.0 -5.38
45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1754 139.6 — — — — +24 +23 — 60.1% +0.89 11–8 (58%) 2–7 (22%) 95.0 +1.26
46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1697 123.6 — — — — — +80 — 38.7% -0.61 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — -1.39
47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1672 91.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.18
Career — 2182 156.8 — — — — +4 +46 +38 60.7% +0.84 101–86 (54%) 58–58 (50%) 98.8 -4.11 — 1864 146.0 — — — — -10 -46 — 55.7% +0.53 28–29 (49%) 14–22 (39%) 94.2 +0.70

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.