H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Dianne Fromholtz vs Rosalyn Fairbank H2H: 1-2

Rosalyn Fairbank holds a 2–1 lead over Dianne Fromholtz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Rosalyn Fairbank leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Rosalyn Fairbank won the 1988 Key Biscayne first round 4-6 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dianne Fromholtz
AUS Age 69 Left-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Rosalyn Fairbank
USA Age 65 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 15, 1988* Key Biscayne WTA 250 R128 Hard Rosalyn Fairbank #42 4-6 6-3 6-0 Dianne Fromholtz #29 Match data
Oct 4, 1985* Fort Lauderdale WTA 250 R16 Hard Dianne Fromholtz #97 6-2 6-4 Rosalyn Fairbank #24 Match data
Dec 7, 1979* Sydney WTA 500 R16 Grass Rosalyn Fairbank 6-4 7-5 Dianne Fromholtz Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Dianne Fromholtz #306 #19 34 2,167 466 282 62.3% 0 0 0 1 21 22
Rosalyn Fairbank #325 #15 51 1,933 336 309 52.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dianne Fromholtz Rosalyn Fairbank
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1971 0–1 0.0% — 1,487 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1972 7–7 50.0% — 1,546 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1973 57–13 81.4% — 1,911 0 12 — — — — — — —
17 1974 52–20 72.2% — 1,963 0 16 1978 3–2 60.0% — 1,525 0 0
18 1975 34–29 54.0% — 1,906 0 16 1979 17–10 63.0% — 1,720 0 0
19 1976 39–13 75.0% — 2,063 0 19 1980 22–20 52.4% — 1,681 0 0
20 1977 32–18 64.0% — 2,074 0 19 1981 15–22 40.5% — 1,657 0 0
21 1978 28–13 68.3% — 2,049 0 21 1982 32–21 60.4% — 1,904 0 0
22 1979 57–27 67.9% — 2,005 0 22 1983 24–19 55.8% — 1,920 0 1
23 1980 46–21 68.7% — 2,009 0 22 1984 22–26 45.8% #32 1,767 0 1
24 1981 13–19 40.6% — 1,740 0 22 1985 28–23 54.9% #38 1,806 0 1
25 1982 16–15 51.6% — 1,786 0 22 1986 23–20 53.5% #28 1,824 0 1
26 1983 7–13 35.0% — 1,691 0 22 1987 21–20 51.2% #36 1,756 0 1
27 1984 3–3 50.0% #138 1,717 0 22 1988 27–22 55.1% #37 1,775 0 1
28 1985 17–17 50.0% #97 1,794 0 22 1989 27–18 60.0% #22 1,846 0 1
29 1986 19–14 57.6% #25 1,818 0 22 1990 26–20 56.5% #24 1,789 0 1
30 1987 19–13 59.4% #21 1,850 0 22 1991 14–19 42.4% #90 1,637 0 1
31 1988 14–14 50.0% #56 1,749 0 22 1992 16–16 50.0% #46 1,728 0 1
32 1989 6–10 37.5% #131 1,674 0 22 1993 17–19 47.2% #63 1,766 0 1
33 1990 0–2 0.0% #306 1,631 0 22 1994 0–4 0.0% #284 1,704 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 1995 2–8 20.0% #261 1,599 0 1