H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Dianne Van Rensburg vs Donna Faber H2H: 1-0

Dianne Van Rensburg holds a 1–0 lead over Donna Faber in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dianne Van Rensburg leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Dianne Van Rensburg won the 1988 Houston round of 32 5-7 6-3 6-3.

H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dianne Van Rensburg 5-7 6-3 6-3 Donna Faber #175 Match data Apr 21, 1988* R32 Houston WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dianne Van Rensburg 1,790 82 92 47.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Donna Faber #227 #55 19 1,718 68 97 41.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dianne Van Rensburg Donna Faber
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 1–2 33.3% #218 1,495 0 0
16 1988 6–9 40.0% #131 1,532 0 0
17 1989 19–19 50.0% #59 1,674 0 0
18 1986 10–8 55.6% 1,642 0 0 1990 15–18 45.5% #84 1,630 0 0
19 1987 11–19 36.7% 1,597 0 0 1991 15–19 44.1% #99 1,593 0 0
20 1988 17–19 47.2% 1,699 0 0 1992 11–20 35.5% #116 1,541 0 0
21 1989 15–20 42.9% 1,652 0 0 1993 1–10 9.1% #227 1,431 0 0
22 1990 23–16 59.0% 1,769 0 1
24 1992 0–1 0.0% 1,747 0 1
25 1993 3–4 42.9% 1,731 0 1
26 1994 3–4 42.9% 1,696 0 1
27 1995 0–1 0.0% 1,672 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dianne Van Rensburg Donna Faber
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1987 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9%
17 1989 15 10 25 60.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1986 7 6 13 53.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 1990 5 7 12 41.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
19 1987 3 5 8 37.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1988 9 8 17 52.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1992 8 12 20 40.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1989 10 10 20 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1993 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1990 18 8 26 69.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 1992 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1993 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1994 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1995 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 53 45 98 54.1% 9 17 26 34.6% 14 19 33 42.4% 6 11 17 35.3% 42 53 95 44.2% 19 29 48 39.6% 6 10 16 37.5% 1 5 6 16.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dianne Van Rensburg Donna Faber
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1987 1496 103.9 33.3% -0.17 +0.11
16 1988 1532 112.2 +4 +14 40.6% -0.63 1–1 1–1 +0.30
17 1989 1675 137.0 +40 -169 -99 48.9% +0.16 7–7 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 100.4 +1.23
18 1986 1643 122.2 +3 -6 51.1% -0.02 6–3 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 108.4 +0.16 1990 1631 115.4 -7 -19 -43 43.1% -0.68 5–1 (83%) 2–1 (67%) +0.90
19 1987 1598 114.7 +12 -97 +48 37.7% -1.01 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -0.96 1991 1593 109.9 -20 +38 +10 41.3% -0.77 9–3 (75%) 4–5 (44%) 106.2 +1.62
20 1988 1699 135.4 -38 -169 -16 50.6% +0.06 6–9 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 100.5 -1.73 1992 1542 119.9 +26 +37 38.0% -0.77 4–5 (44%) 1–4 (20%) 97.6 +0.56
21 1989 1653 133.1 +20 -138 +24 46.8% -0.52 1–6 (14%) 1–3 (25%) 93.7 -0.34 1993 1432 94.2 +34 20.0% -2.12 0–3 (0%) 3–2 (60%) 97.5 +0.77
22 1990 1770 142.6 +68 -265 -94 56.0% +0.38 8–5 (62%) 6–6 (50%) 104.0 -0.17
24 1992 1748 96.6 33.3% -1.67 0–1 +0.14
25 1993 1731 115.9 +47 43.8% -0.81 1–1 2–0 -0.48
26 1994 1697 109.2 +50 46.7% -0.53 0–1 1–0 -0.24
27 1995 1673 96.4 0.0% -3.50 +0.01
Career 1790 134.8 +23 -158 +6 48.1% -0.26 27–30 (47%) 18–15 (55%) 105.0 -2.07 1719 121.4 +14 -11 -44 41.2% -0.60 26–20 (57%) 13–17 (43%) 103.5 +3.33

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.