H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Dianne Van Rensburg vs Veronika Martinek H2H: 1-1
Dianne Van Rensburg and Veronika Martinek are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Dianne Van Rensburg leads 1–0 on clay, while Veronika Martinek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Veronika Martinek won the 1992 Filderstadt third round 4-6 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 58
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 54
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 1992* | Filderstadt | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Veronika Martinek | 4-6 6-2 6-3 | Dianne Van Rensburg | Match data |
| May 17, 1989* | Berlin | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Dianne Van Rensburg | 6-4 6-4 | Veronika Martinek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dianne Van Rensburg | — | — | — | 1,790 | 82 | 92 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Veronika Martinek | #530 | #49 | 177 | 1,664 | 73 | 104 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dianne Van Rensburg | Veronika Martinek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #116 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #160 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1986 | 10–8 | 55.6% | — | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #54 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1987 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #74 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1988 | 17–19 | 47.2% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #61 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1989 | 15–20 | 42.9% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #131 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1990 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,770 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #86 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #80 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #143 | 1,489 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1993 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #144 | 1,522 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1994 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #465 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |