H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Dinara Safina vs Aravane Rezai H2H: 1-1
Dinara Safina and Aravane Rezai are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Dinara Safina leads 1–0 on clay, while Aravane Rezai leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Aravane Rezai won the 2009 Toronto third round 3-6 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 40
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 39
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2009* | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Aravane Rezai | 3-6 6-2 6-4 | Dinara Safina | Match data |
| Jun 2, 2009* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Dinara Safina | 6-1 6-0 | Aravane Rezai | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dinara Safina | #452 | #1 | 10,521 | 2,120 | 299 | 160 | 65.1% | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 11 |
| Aravane Rezai | #685 | #15 | 3,100 | 1,879 | 109 | 117 | 48.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dinara Safina | Aravane Rezai | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2002 | 12–5 | 70.6% | #68 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2003 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #54 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2004 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #44 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2005 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #41 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2006 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #11 | 1,871 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #90 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #15 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #77 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #3 | 2,020 | 0 | 8 | 2009 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #25 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2009 | 55–16 | 77.5% | #2 | 1,951 | 0 | 11 | 2010 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #19 | 1,697 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2010 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #63 | 1,795 | 0 | 11 | 2011 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,582 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2011 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #132 | 1,783 | 0 | 11 | 2012 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #171 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #527 | 1,523 | 0 | 4 |