H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Dinara Safina vs Jelena Dokic H2H: 3-0
Dinara Safina holds a 3–0 lead over Jelena Dokic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Dinara Safina leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dinara Safina won the 2011 Miami first round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 40
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2011* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Dinara Safina | 6-4 6-4 | Jelena Dokic | Match data |
| Jan 29, 2009* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | QF | Hard | Dinara Safina | 6-4 4-6 6-4 | Jelena Dokic | Match data |
| Sep 19, 2003* | Shanghai | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Dinara Safina | 6-1 6-4 | Jelena Dokic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dinara Safina | #452 | #1 | 10,521 | 2,120 | 299 | 160 | 65.1% | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 11 |
| Jelena Dokic | #945 | #4 | 3,338 | 2,031 | 208 | 175 | 54.3% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dinara Safina | Jelena Dokic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2002 | 12–5 | 70.6% | #68 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #43 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2003 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #54 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2004 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #44 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #8 | 1,999 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 2005 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 53–27 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,897 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 2006 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #11 | 1,871 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #15 | 1,778 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 2007 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #15 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #124 | 1,582 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 2008 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #3 | 2,020 | 0 | 8 | 2005 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #349 | 1,525 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2009 | 55–16 | 77.5% | #2 | 1,951 | 0 | 11 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,499 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2010 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #63 | 1,795 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2011 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #132 | 1,783 | 0 | 11 | 2008 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #179 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #56 | 1,527 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #138 | 1,513 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #258 | 1,516 | 0 | 6 |