H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Dinara Safina vs Jill Craybas H2H: 6-0

Dinara Safina holds a 6–0 lead over Jill Craybas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Dinara Safina leads 3–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Dinara Safina won the 2011 Fes third round 6-1 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dinara Safina
RUS Age 40 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
6 – 0
6 main draw meetings
Jill Craybas
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 21, 2011* Fes WTA 250 R32 Clay Dinara Safina #74 6-1 6-0 Jill Craybas #105 Match data
Mar 13, 2009* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R16 Hard Dinara Safina #2 7-5 6-4 Jill Craybas #102 Match data
Mar 12, 2008* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Dinara Safina #15 7-6(3) 7-5 Jill Craybas #68 Match data
Jun 28, 2006* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Dinara Safina #17 3-6 7-5 7-5 Jill Craybas #43 Match data
Oct 28, 2005* Hasselt WTA 500 R16 Hard Dinara Safina #21 6-1 7-6(3) Jill Craybas #48 Match data
Apr 30, 2005* Estoril WTA 250 QF Clay Dinara Safina #38 6-4 6-2 Jill Craybas #106 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Dinara Safina #452 #1 10,521 2,120 299 160 65.1% 0 5 0 2 4 11
Jill Craybas #336 #39 974 1,695 161 256 38.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dinara Safina Jill Craybas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 12–5 70.6% #68 1,667 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 2003 18–15 54.5% #54 1,749 0 2 — — — — — — —
18 2004 20–19 51.3% #44 1,713 0 2 — — — — — — —
19 2005 37–19 66.1% #20 1,839 0 4 — — — — — — —
20 2006 44–21 67.7% #11 1,871 0 4 — — — — — — —
21 2007 38–22 63.3% #15 1,862 0 4 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0
22 2008 51–18 73.9% #3 2,020 0 8 — — — — — — —
23 2009 55–16 77.5% #2 1,951 0 11 1998 0–1 0.0% #154 1,473 0 0
24 2010 13–16 44.8% #63 1,795 0 11 1999 0–4 0.0% #175 1,445 0 0
25 2011 11–9 55.0% #132 1,783 0 11 2000 1–2 33.3% #145 1,449 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2001 8–17 32.0% #98 1,479 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2002 19–15 55.9% #57 1,652 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 2003 16–22 42.1% #99 1,568 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2004 12–21 36.4% #59 1,499 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2005 19–23 45.2% #48 1,614 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2006 18–25 41.9% #70 1,569 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2007 12–27 30.8% #79 1,472 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2008 22–25 46.8% #64 1,575 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2009 12–21 36.4% #76 1,592 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2010 12–23 34.3% #98 1,546 0 1
36 — — — — — — — 2011 6–20 23.1% #150 1,442 0 1
37 — — — — — — — 2012 3–7 30.0% #189 1,449 0 1
38 — — — — — — — 2013 1–2 33.3% #336 1,451 0 1