H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Dinara Safina vs Laura Granville H2H: 3-1
Dinara Safina holds a 3–1 lead over Laura Granville in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Dinara Safina leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Dinara Safina won the 2007 Miami second round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 40
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 45
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2007* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Dinara Safina | 6-1 6-1 | Laura Granville | Match data |
| Aug 11, 2006* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Dinara Safina | 6-2 7-6(2) | Laura Granville | Match data |
| Jan 13, 2005* | Hobart | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Dinara Safina | 6-4 6-2 | Laura Granville | Match data |
| Jan 9, 2003* | Canberra | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Laura Granville | 6-1 3-6 6-3 | Dinara Safina | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dinara Safina | #452 | #1 | 10,521 | 2,120 | 299 | 160 | 65.1% | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 11 |
| Laura Granville | #466 | #28 | 1,063 | 1,722 | 86 | 108 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dinara Safina | Laura Granville | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2002 | 12–5 | 70.6% | #68 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2003 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #54 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2004 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #44 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #841 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2005 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2006 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #11 | 1,871 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #15 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #49 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #3 | 2,020 | 0 | 8 | 2003 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 55–16 | 77.5% | #2 | 1,951 | 0 | 11 | 2004 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #74 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #63 | 1,795 | 0 | 11 | 2005 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #60 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #132 | 1,783 | 0 | 11 | 2006 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #68 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #61 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #379 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #293 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #448 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |