H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Dinara Safina vs Marion Bartoli H2H: 0-3
Marion Bartoli holds a 3–0 lead over Dinara Safina in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Marion Bartoli leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marion Bartoli won the 2011 Hobart third round 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 40
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 41
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2011* | Hobart | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Marion Bartoli | 6-0 6-1 | Dinara Safina | Match data |
| Aug 13, 2007 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Marion Bartoli | 6-2 6-7(2) 6-0 | Dinara Safina | Match data |
| Mar 8, 2007* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Marion Bartoli | 6-4 6-3 | Dinara Safina | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dinara Safina | #452 | #1 | 10,521 | 2,120 | 299 | 160 | 65.1% | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 11 |
| Marion Bartoli | #13 | #7 | 5,160 | 1,996 | 402 | 267 | 60.1% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dinara Safina | Marion Bartoli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2002 | 12–5 | 70.6% | #68 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2003 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #54 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2004 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #44 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #58 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2005 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #41 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2006 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #11 | 1,871 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #37 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #15 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 45–28 | 61.6% | #18 | 1,800 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2008 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #3 | 2,020 | 0 | 8 | 2007 | 47–31 | 60.3% | #10 | 1,873 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2009 | 55–16 | 77.5% | #2 | 1,951 | 0 | 11 | 2008 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #17 | 1,809 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2010 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #63 | 1,795 | 0 | 11 | 2009 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #11 | 1,882 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2011 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #132 | 1,783 | 0 | 11 | 2010 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #16 | 1,820 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 60–26 | 69.8% | #9 | 1,907 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #11 | 1,814 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #13 | 1,808 | 1 | 8 |