H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Dinara Safina vs Mathilde Johansson H2H: 1-0
Dinara Safina holds a 1–0 lead over Mathilde Johansson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dinara Safina leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dinara Safina won the 2009 Miami second round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 40
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 41
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2009* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Dinara Safina | 6-1 6-3 | Mathilde Johansson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dinara Safina | #452 | #1 | 10,521 | 2,120 | 299 | 160 | 65.1% | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 11 |
| Mathilde Johansson | #235 | #59 | 992 | 1,619 | 44 | 75 | 37.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dinara Safina | Mathilde Johansson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2002 | 12–5 | 70.6% | #68 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2003 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #54 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2004 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #44 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2005 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2006 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #11 | 1,871 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #15 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #3 | 2,020 | 0 | 8 | 2007 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 55–16 | 77.5% | #2 | 1,951 | 0 | 11 | 2008 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #85 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #63 | 1,795 | 0 | 11 | 2009 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #125 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #132 | 1,783 | 0 | 11 | 2010 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #102 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #77 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #87 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #136 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #207 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |