H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Dinara Safina vs Miriam Oremans H2H: 1-0
Dinara Safina holds a 1–0 lead over Miriam Oremans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dinara Safina leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Dinara Safina won the 2002 Estoril fourth round 6-1 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 40
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 53
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2002* | Estoril | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Dinara Safina | 6-1 7-6(5) | Miriam Oremans | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dinara Safina | #452 | #1 | 10,521 | 2,120 | 299 | 160 | 65.1% | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 11 |
| Miriam Oremans | #193 | #25 | 585 | 1,809 | 161 | 181 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dinara Safina | Miriam Oremans | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2002 | 12–5 | 70.6% | #68 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2003 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #54 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2004 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #44 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2005 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #130 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2006 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #11 | 1,871 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #31 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #15 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #48 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #3 | 2,020 | 0 | 8 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #42 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 55–16 | 77.5% | #2 | 1,951 | 0 | 11 | 1996 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #46 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #63 | 1,795 | 0 | 11 | 1997 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #132 | 1,783 | 0 | 11 | 1998 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #57 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #98 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #64 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #84 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #124 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |