H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Dinara Safina vs Nicole Pratt H2H: 1-1

Dinara Safina and Nicole Pratt are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicole Pratt won the 2007 Sydney International round of 32 4-6 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dinara Safina
RUS Age 40 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Nicole Pratt
AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nicole Pratt #72 4-6 6-3 6-2 Dinara Safina #10 Match data Jan 11, 2007* R32 Sydney International Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Dinara Safina #14 6-1 6-0 Nicole Pratt #111 Match data Aug 19, 2006* QF Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dinara Safina #452 #1 10,521 2,126 304 161 65.4% 0 5 0 2 4 11
Nicole Pratt #1,043 #35 924 1,764 159 219 42.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dinara Safina Nicole Pratt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2002 12–5 70.6% #68 1,666 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 2003 18–15 54.5% #54 1,749 0 2 1990 1–1 50.0% #201 1,497 0 0
18 2004 20–19 51.3% #44 1,713 0 2 1991 1–7 12.5% #201 1,469 0 0
19 2005 37–19 66.1% #20 1,832 0 4 1992 3–3 50.0% #203 1,491 0 0
20 2006 44–21 67.7% #11 1,870 0 4 1993 2–5 28.6% #172 1,486 0 0
21 2007 38–22 63.3% #15 1,864 0 4 1994 2–5 28.6% #224 1,465 0 0
22 2008 56–19 74.7% #3 2,032 0 8 1995 0–2 0.0% #214 1,451 0 0
23 2009 55–16 77.5% #2 1,956 0 11 1996 0–2 0.0% #194 1,433 0 0
24 2010 13–16 44.8% #63 1,798 0 11 1997 5–4 55.6% #110 1,494 0 0
25 2011 11–9 55.0% #132 1,810 0 11 1998 4–13 23.5% #113 1,464 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 1999 15–17 46.9% #56 1,598 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2000 17–24 41.5% #54 1,630 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2001 22–23 48.9% #51 1,706 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2002 23–20 53.5% #48 1,719 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2003 17–23 42.5% #53 1,646 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2004 21–22 48.8% #50 1,627 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2005 8–17 32.0% #126 1,552 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2006 8–12 40.0% #77 1,528 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2007 10–16 38.5% #70 1,559 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2008 0–3 0.0% #1043 1,538 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dinara Safina Nicole Pratt
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2002 2 2 4 50.0% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 8 9 17 47.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 12 9 21 57.1% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2005 16 13 29 55.2% 9 3 12 75.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 8 1 9 88.9% 1992 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 21 12 33 63.6% 16 5 21 76.2% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1993 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 19 14 33 57.6% 13 5 18 72.2% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 1994 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 2008 36 14 50 72.0% 14 3 17 82.4% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2009 27 12 39 69.2% 20 2 22 90.9% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2010 12 11 23 52.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1997 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 2011 5 6 11 45.5% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1998 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 11 11 22 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 6 13 19 31.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 17 14 31 54.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 15 13 28 53.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 16 14 30 53.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 17 16 33 51.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 4 8 12 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 6 8 14 42.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 158 102 260 60.8% 101 37 138 73.2% 27 14 41 65.9% 18 8 26 69.2% — 113 141 254 44.5% 24 43 67 35.8% 18 25 43 41.9% 4 10 14 28.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dinara Safina Nicole Pratt
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2002 1667 133.0 — — — — -103 +63 — 63.2% +1.13 4–2 (67%) 3–3 (50%) 105.1 -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2003 1749 135.3 +0.19 +0.42 0.979 48.8% -103 +66 — 57.5% +0.55 3–8 (27%) 2–5 (29%) 92.7 -1.56 1990 1497 96.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.59
18 2004 1714 138.8 -1.62 -0.49 0.830 46.5% +32 -9 — 51.2% +0.20 6–6 (50%) 1–5 (17%) 96.6 -1.30 1991 1469 104.6 — — — — +37 — — 17.6% -2.71 0–1 — — -0.50
19 2005 1832 141.9 +1.43 -1.83 0.937 48.6% -7 -51 -239 62.5% +0.70 10–8 (56%) 11–4 (73%) 104.7 -1.43 1992 1492 108.8 — — — — +29 — — 50.0% +0.83 — 0–1 — +0.66
20 2006 1870 153.3 +1.50 +3.28 1.104 52.3% -58 +92 -143 64.8% +1.15 10–4 (71%) 5–4 (56%) 105.4 +0.58 1993 1487 109.4 — — — — +23 — — 33.3% -1.53 0–1 — — -0.35
21 2007 1864 144.9 +1.88 +1.34 1.047 51.3% -40 +145 -92 59.1% +0.55 10–6 (63%) 8–5 (62%) 104.1 +2.70 1994 1465 92.2 — — — — +13 — — 31.3% -2.06 1–1 1–0 — +0.51
22 2008 2033 163.1 +5.48 +4.99 1.212 54.2% -37 +68 -221 68.8% +1.40 15–7 (68%) 14–7 (67%) 108.7 -1.19 1995 1452 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.06
23 2009 1956 156.1 +4.17 +4.65 1.212 54.1% -64 +244 -32 71.6% +1.59 16–6 (73%) 7–9 (44%) 98.7 -0.83 1996 1434 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01
24 2010 1799 141.8 -0.37 +2.20 0.978 49.5% +10 +257 — 48.4% -0.22 3–5 (38%) 6–4 (60%) 95.1 -1.09 1997 1495 107.7 — — — — +15 — — 52.4% +0.09 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +0.88
25 2011 1811 133.4 -0.12 +1.99 1.031 50.7% -8 +212 — 60.5% +0.14 3–4 (43%) 3–0 (100%) 99.3 -2.13 1998 1465 116.3 — — — — +15 +68 — 32.5% -0.78 1–5 (17%) 0–2 — +0.10
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1598 112.5 — — — — -23 -75 -40 47.0% -0.68 3–3 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 103.5 +0.11
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1631 127.0 — — — — -52 -72 -60 40.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 98.6 -0.98
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1707 140.8 — — — — -13 -131 -117 49.5% +0.03 7–6 (54%) 1–6 (14%) 98.7 -1.74
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1720 135.5 — — — — -9 -112 -58 51.0% +0.14 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 106.8 -0.86
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1647 126.9 -0.42 +0.77 0.964 49.1% +47 -102 -73 43.4% -0.35 10–9 (53%) 4–2 (67%) 100.0 -0.96
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1628 117.6 -0.23 -0.93 0.907 47.8% +15 -55 — 46.9% -0.65 10–4 (71%) 9–4 (69%) 108.4 -0.14
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1553 107.5 +0.05 +0.38 1.046 50.5% +30 -50 -13 30.2% -1.49 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — -0.66
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1528 101.2 -2.17 -1.75 0.815 45.5% -18 — +66 39.1% -1.13 4–4 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 100.6 +0.71
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1560 121.7 -1.99 -1.97 0.875 47.0% +13 -85 — 40.6% -0.80 6–6 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 104.7 -0.64
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1538 105.2 -1.42 -0.19 0.647 40.0% +9 — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.45
Career — 2127 154.7 +2.67 +3.16 1.108 52.3% -34 +109 -137 62.6% +0.88 80–56 (59%) 60–46 (57%) 104.2 -1.42 — 1764 126.0 -1.39 -1.16 0.877 47.0% +3 -77 -46 42.3% -0.63 59–52 (53%) 33–28 (54%) 105.5 -0.98

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.