H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Dominique Monami vs Andrea Temesvari H2H: 1-0

Dominique Monami holds a 1–0 lead over Andrea Temesvari in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dominique Monami leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Dominique Monami won the 1992 Linz Open round of 32 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dominique Monami
BEL Age 53 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Andrea Temesvari
HUN Age 60 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dominique Monami #94 6-2 6-1 Andrea Temesvari #126 Match data Feb 13, 1992* R32 Linz Open Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dominique Monami — #9 2,196 1,974 208 158 56.8% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Andrea Temesvari — #7 109 2,022 185 179 50.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dominique Monami Andrea Temesvari
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1981 11–6 64.7% — 1,624 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1982 18–14 56.2% — 1,771 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 1983 42–15 73.7% — 1,990 0 4
18 1991 4–5 44.4% #129 1,528 0 0 1984 24–16 60.0% #14 1,889 0 4
19 1992 9–14 39.1% #99 1,550 0 0 1985 18–12 60.0% #16 1,849 0 5
20 1993 15–14 51.7% #59 1,672 0 0 1986 11–12 47.8% #43 1,802 0 5
21 1994 7–16 30.4% #134 1,601 0 0 1987 1–2 33.3% — 1,776 0 5
22 1995 12–9 57.1% #43 1,680 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1996 14–14 50.0% #48 1,698 0 1 1989 18–15 54.5% #43 1,750 0 5
24 1997 39–17 69.6% #18 1,875 0 3 1990 8–19 29.6% #117 1,612 0 5
25 1998 45–24 65.2% #12 1,917 0 4 1991 6–14 30.0% #159 1,542 0 5
26 1999 37–25 59.7% #14 1,840 0 4 1992 11–12 47.8% #70 1,607 0 5
27 2000 26–20 56.5% — 1,842 0 4 1993 5–20 20.0% #153 1,475 0 5
28 — — — — — — — 1994 2–7 22.2% #133 1,476 0 5
29 — — — — — — — 1995 6–8 42.9% #90 1,485 0 5
30 — — — — — — — 1996 4–6 40.0% #181 1,532 0 5
31 — — — — — — — 1997 0–1 0.0% #940 1,529 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dominique Monami Andrea Temesvari
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 2 2 4 50.0% 29 5 34 85.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 9 7 16 56.3%
18 1991 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1984 5 3 8 62.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 5 9 44.4%
19 1992 4 7 11 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1985 7 3 10 70.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
20 1993 5 6 11 45.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1986 6 5 11 54.5% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
21 1994 5 7 12 41.7% 0 6 6 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1987 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1995 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1989 9 7 16 56.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1997 21 7 28 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 1990 1 7 8 12.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
25 1998 21 10 31 67.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 12 6 18 66.7% 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 1999 17 11 28 60.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 7 18 61.1% 1992 4 4 8 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 2000 16 13 29 55.2% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 3 9 12 25.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 100 74 174 57.5% 36 35 71 50.7% 25 18 43 58.1% 47 31 78 60.3% — 44 57 101 43.6% 89 62 151 58.9% 15 15 30 50.0% 26 43 69 37.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dominique Monami Andrea Temesvari
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1624 130.8 — — — — — — — 60.5% +0.97 3–1 (75%) 0–2 — -0.16
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1772 146.5 — — — — -152 -31 -162 59.2% +0.69 3–6 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 -3.02
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1990 163.1 — — — — -215 +103 -366 75.4% +2.16 4–4 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 101.7 +1.39
18 1991 1529 107.3 — — — — +47 — — 50.0% -0.19 — — — +0.79 1984 1890 136.6 — — — — -79 +109 -174 61.2% +0.68 5–4 (56%) 6–2 (75%) 105.4 +3.45
19 1992 1551 121.2 — — — — +77 -68 — 39.6% -0.74 4–3 (57%) 1–1 — +1.30 1985 1849 136.5 — — — — -48 +129 — 61.5% +0.86 3–4 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 95.7 +1.41
20 1993 1673 124.4 — — — — +19 -121 — 51.6% -0.16 3–3 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 102.4 +0.78 1986 1802 139.5 — — — — -39 +157 — 55.1% +0.29 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) 94.1 -0.74
21 1994 1601 118.5 — — — — +38 -104 -2 34.0% -1.21 3–4 (43%) 3–1 (75%) 101.2 -0.21 1987 1776 105.3 — — — — -39 — — 42.9% -1.29 0–1 — — -0.17
22 1995 1681 130.2 — — — — +7 — — 59.5% +0.60 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1996 1699 137.0 — — — — -80 -64 -8 52.5% +0.41 1–4 (20%) 2–4 (33%) 97.4 +0.12 1989 1751 135.3 — — — — -31 +153 — 50.0% -0.01 7–3 (70%) 5–6 (45%) 102.1 -0.31
24 1997 1876 147.0 — — — — -17 -173 -163 66.9% +1.26 8–7 (53%) 7–4 (64%) 104.5 +2.75 1990 1612 121.4 — — — — +9 +190 — 34.5% -1.48 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 98.1 +0.21
25 1998 1918 156.3 — — — — +12 -179 -127 62.9% +0.87 10–7 (59%) 8–4 (67%) 104.2 +1.40 1991 1542 110.6 — — — — +7 +224 +66 36.4% -1.34 0–4 (0%) 1–4 (20%) 92.0 +0.26
26 1999 1840 149.4 — — — — +15 -122 -45 58.8% +0.77 8–5 (62%) 4–6 (40%) 100.4 +2.82 1992 1608 122.1 — — — — -5 +81 +64 41.5% -0.70 7–2 (78%) 3–3 (50%) 106.9 +0.26
27 2000 1842 150.9 — — — — +6 -105 +51 58.8% +0.69 8–5 (62%) 5–6 (45%) 102.9 -2.21 1993 1476 111.1 — — — — +32 +134 — 28.8% -1.37 3–5 (38%) 2–4 (33%) 97.7 +0.66
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1477 113.1 — — — — +1 +154 — 27.8% -1.83 1–1 — — -0.25
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1486 104.7 — — — — -22 +124 — 43.8% -0.38 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 100.7 +1.71
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1532 128.1 — — — — — +113 — 45.5% -0.36 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.42
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1529 108.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.29
Career — 1974 148.4 — — — — +10 -125 -57 56.7% +0.49 46–41 (53%) 34–30 (53%) 105.7 +2.09 — 2022 143.4 — — — — -57 +117 -111 52.6% +0.18 42–48 (47%) 33–38 (46%) 97.5 +1.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.