H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Dominique Monami vs Florencia Labat H2H: 1-3
Florencia Labat holds a 3–1 lead over Dominique Monami in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Florencia Labat leads 2–0 on clay, while Dominique Monami leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Florencia Labat won the 1996 Key Biscayne second round 4-6 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 53
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 55
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 1996* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Florencia Labat | 4-6 6-2 6-3 | Dominique Monami | Match data |
| Jun 1, 1995* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Florencia Labat | 1-6 6-2 6-0 | Dominique Monami | Match data |
| May 26, 1993* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Florencia Labat | 6-4 6-0 | Dominique Monami | Match data |
| Oct 2, 1992* | Bayonne | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Dominique Monami | 6-4 6-2 | Florencia Labat | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominique Monami | #24 | #9 | 2,196 | 1,973 | 205 | 156 | 56.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Florencia Labat | #106 | #26 | 733 | 1,875 | 190 | 181 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dominique Monami | Florencia Labat | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1991 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #129 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #99 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #59 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #60 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #134 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #52 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #38 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 39–17 | 69.6% | #18 | 1,875 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #55 | 1,783 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 45–24 | 65.2% | #12 | 1,917 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #42 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #14 | 1,839 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #39 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #24 | 1,814 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #64 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #106 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |