H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Dominique Monami vs Ginger Helgeson H2H: 1-1
Dominique Monami and Ginger Helgeson are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Dominique Monami leads 1–0 on grass, while Ginger Helgeson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dominique Monami won the 1997 Birmingham fourth round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 53
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 1997* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Dominique Monami | 6-2 6-4 | Ginger Helgeson | Match data |
| Mar 13, 1994* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Ginger Helgeson | 6-3 6-2 | Dominique Monami | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominique Monami | #24 | #9 | 2,196 | 1,973 | 205 | 156 | 56.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Ginger Helgeson | #467 | #29 | 246 | 1,865 | 94 | 95 | 49.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Dominique Monami | Ginger Helgeson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1991 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #129 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #99 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #246 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #59 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #134 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #71 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #54 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 39–17 | 69.6% | #18 | 1,875 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #111 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 45–24 | 65.2% | #12 | 1,917 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #792 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #14 | 1,839 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #167 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #24 | 1,814 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #152 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |