H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Dominique Monami vs Linda Wild H2H: 2-1
Dominique Monami holds a 2–1 lead over Linda Wild in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Linda Wild leads 1–0 on carpet, while Dominique Monami leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Dominique Monami won the 1997 Rosmalen third round 7-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 53
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 1997* | Rosmalen | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Dominique Monami | 7-6 6-2 | Linda Wild | Match data |
| Jan 9, 1997* | Hobart | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Dominique Monami | 6-1 6-2 | Linda Wild | Match data |
| Oct 3, 1993* | Sapporo | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Linda Wild | 6-4 6-7 6-1 | Dominique Monami | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominique Monami | #24 | #9 | 2,196 | 1,973 | 205 | 156 | 56.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Linda Wild | #252 | #23 | 823 | 1,823 | 135 | 146 | 48.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dominique Monami | Linda Wild | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1991 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #129 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #155 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #99 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #59 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #41 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #134 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #49 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1996 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #49 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1997 | 39–17 | 69.6% | #18 | 1,875 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #58 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1998 | 45–24 | 65.2% | #12 | 1,917 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #29 | 1,817 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1999 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #14 | 1,839 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #223 | 1,629 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2000 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #24 | 1,814 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,570 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,543 | 0 | 5 |