H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Dominique Monami vs Mariaan De Swardt H2H: 1-1
Dominique Monami and Mariaan De Swardt are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Dominique Monami leads 1–0 on grass, while Mariaan De Swardt leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dominique Monami won the 1998 Birmingham fourth round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 53
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Age 55
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 1998* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Dominique Monami | 7-5 6-3 | Mariaan De Swardt | Match data |
| Aug 28, 1996* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Mariaan De Swardt | 1-6 6-2 7-6 | Dominique Monami | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominique Monami | #24 | #9 | 2,196 | 1,973 | 205 | 156 | 56.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Mariaan De Swardt | — | — | — | 1,784 | 65 | 81 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dominique Monami | Mariaan De Swardt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1991 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #129 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #99 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1993 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #59 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 10–8 | 55.6% | — | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #134 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 39–17 | 69.6% | #18 | 1,875 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 45–24 | 65.2% | #12 | 1,917 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #14 | 1,839 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #24 | 1,814 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 17–10 | 63.0% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 1 |