H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Dominique Monami vs Maureen Drake H2H: 3-0
Dominique Monami holds a 3–0 lead over Maureen Drake in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Dominique Monami leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Dominique Monami won the 1999 US Open first round 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 53
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 55
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 1999* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Dominique Monami | 6-1 6-0 | Maureen Drake | Match data |
| Aug 5, 1999* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Dominique Monami | 6-3 7-5 | Maureen Drake | Match data |
| Jun 26, 1996* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Dominique Monami | 6-3 6-3 | Maureen Drake | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominique Monami | #24 | #9 | 2,196 | 1,973 | 205 | 156 | 56.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Maureen Drake | #1,132 | #47 | 612 | 1,586 | 40 | 93 | 30.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dominique Monami | Maureen Drake | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #275 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1991 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #129 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #163 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #99 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #209 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #59 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #198 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #134 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,412 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #171 | 1,415 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #170 | 1,411 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 39–17 | 69.6% | #18 | 1,875 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 45–24 | 65.2% | #12 | 1,917 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #173 | 1,432 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #14 | 1,839 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #24 | 1,814 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #130 | 1,412 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #57 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #147 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #161 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #115 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #278 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |