H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Dominique Monami vs Nicole Arendt H2H: 1-0
Dominique Monami holds a 1–0 lead over Nicole Arendt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dominique Monami leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Dominique Monami won the 1999 Rome second round 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 53
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 56
Left-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 1999* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Dominique Monami | 6-1 6-0 | Nicole Arendt | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominique Monami | #24 | #9 | 2,196 | 1,973 | 205 | 156 | 56.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Nicole Arendt | #433 | #49 | 487 | 1,776 | 67 | 75 | 47.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dominique Monami | Nicole Arendt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #366 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1991 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #129 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1992 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #99 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1993 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #59 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1994 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #134 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #218 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #88 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 39–17 | 69.6% | #18 | 1,875 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #73 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 45–24 | 65.2% | #12 | 1,917 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #117 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #14 | 1,839 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #79 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #24 | 1,814 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #63 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #143 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #433 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |